[VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.5.0

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
11 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.5.0

clebertsuconic
I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.5.0 release.

This is a great release, with 190 tasks completed including bug fixes,
improvements, new features and additional tasks. I really appreciate
everyone's contribution on making this happening. Thank you so much!


I would like to highlight the features introduced on this release:

[ARTEMIS-853] - Support for exclusive consumers
[ARTEMIS-1030] - Support equivilent ActiveMQ 5.x Virtual Topic Naming Abilities
[ARTEMIS-1548] - Support CRL
[ARTEMIS-1550] - Support LVQ for OpenWire
[ARTEMIS-1600] - Support masked passwords in bootstrap.xm and login.config
[ARTEMIS-1623] - create an ActiveMQServerPlugin for logging various
broker events
[ARTEMIS-1649] - enable openssl provider for Netty
[ARTEMIS-1661] - Enable splitting of broker.xml into multiple files
[ARTEMIS-1663] - Add enhanced message count and size metrics for Queues


Given the length of this release, please refer to JIRA for the
complete report of fixes included on 2.5.0:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315920&version=12342127



Source and binary distributions can be found here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-artemis/2.5.0


The Maven repository is here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1156


In case you want to give it a try with the maven repo on examples:
http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/docs/latest/hacking-guide/validating-releases.html


The source tag:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-artemis.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/2.5.0

I will update the website after the vote has passed.



[ ] +1 approve the release as Apache Artemis 2.4.0
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

Here's my +1
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.5.0

tabish121@gmail.com
On 03/12/2018 04:40 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote:

> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.5.0 release.
>
> This is a great release, with 190 tasks completed including bug fixes,
> improvements, new features and additional tasks. I really appreciate
> everyone's contribution on making this happening. Thank you so much!
>
>
> I would like to highlight the features introduced on this release:
>
> [ARTEMIS-853] - Support for exclusive consumers
> [ARTEMIS-1030] - Support equivilent ActiveMQ 5.x Virtual Topic Naming Abilities
> [ARTEMIS-1548] - Support CRL
> [ARTEMIS-1550] - Support LVQ for OpenWire
> [ARTEMIS-1600] - Support masked passwords in bootstrap.xm and login.config
> [ARTEMIS-1623] - create an ActiveMQServerPlugin for logging various
> broker events
> [ARTEMIS-1649] - enable openssl provider for Netty
> [ARTEMIS-1661] - Enable splitting of broker.xml into multiple files
> [ARTEMIS-1663] - Add enhanced message count and size metrics for Queues
>
>
> Given the length of this release, please refer to JIRA for the
> complete report of fixes included on 2.5.0:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315920&version=12342127
>
>
>
> Source and binary distributions can be found here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-artemis/2.5.0
>
>
> The Maven repository is here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1156
>
>
> In case you want to give it a try with the maven repo on examples:
> http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/docs/latest/hacking-guide/validating-releases.html
>
>
> The source tag:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-artemis.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/2.5.0
>
> I will update the website after the vote has passed.
>
>
>
> [ ] +1 approve the release as Apache Artemis 2.4.0
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Here's my +1
>

+1

* Validated license and notice files
* Validated signatures and checksums
* Ran the binary broker and ran some AMQP sample applications against it
* Built from source and ran some of the tests
* Ran mvn -P release apache-rat:check to validate source files had
license headers

--
Tim Bish
twitter: @tabish121
blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.5.0

christopher.l.shannon
+1

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 4:05 PM, Timothy Bish <[hidden email]> wrote:

> On 03/12/2018 04:40 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote:
>>
>> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.5.0 release.
>>
>> This is a great release, with 190 tasks completed including bug fixes,
>> improvements, new features and additional tasks. I really appreciate
>> everyone's contribution on making this happening. Thank you so much!
>>
>>
>> I would like to highlight the features introduced on this release:
>>
>> [ARTEMIS-853] - Support for exclusive consumers
>> [ARTEMIS-1030] - Support equivilent ActiveMQ 5.x Virtual Topic Naming
>> Abilities
>> [ARTEMIS-1548] - Support CRL
>> [ARTEMIS-1550] - Support LVQ for OpenWire
>> [ARTEMIS-1600] - Support masked passwords in bootstrap.xm and login.config
>> [ARTEMIS-1623] - create an ActiveMQServerPlugin for logging various
>> broker events
>> [ARTEMIS-1649] - enable openssl provider for Netty
>> [ARTEMIS-1661] - Enable splitting of broker.xml into multiple files
>> [ARTEMIS-1663] - Add enhanced message count and size metrics for Queues
>>
>>
>> Given the length of this release, please refer to JIRA for the
>> complete report of fixes included on 2.5.0:
>>
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315920&version=12342127
>>
>>
>>
>> Source and binary distributions can be found here:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-artemis/2.5.0
>>
>>
>> The Maven repository is here:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1156
>>
>>
>> In case you want to give it a try with the maven repo on examples:
>>
>> http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/docs/latest/hacking-guide/validating-releases.html
>>
>>
>> The source tag:
>>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-artemis.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/2.5.0
>>
>> I will update the website after the vote has passed.
>>
>>
>>
>> [ ] +1 approve the release as Apache Artemis 2.4.0
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>> Here's my +1
>>
>
> +1
>
> * Validated license and notice files
> * Validated signatures and checksums
> * Ran the binary broker and ran some AMQP sample applications against it
> * Built from source and ran some of the tests
> * Ran mvn -P release apache-rat:check to validate source files had license
> headers
>
> --
> Tim Bish
> twitter: @tabish121
> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.5.0

dejanb
+1

Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
http://sensatic.net/about

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 12:25 AM, Christopher Shannon <
[hidden email]> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 4:05 PM, Timothy Bish <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > On 03/12/2018 04:40 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote:
> >>
> >> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.5.0 release.
> >>
> >> This is a great release, with 190 tasks completed including bug fixes,
> >> improvements, new features and additional tasks. I really appreciate
> >> everyone's contribution on making this happening. Thank you so much!
> >>
> >>
> >> I would like to highlight the features introduced on this release:
> >>
> >> [ARTEMIS-853] - Support for exclusive consumers
> >> [ARTEMIS-1030] - Support equivilent ActiveMQ 5.x Virtual Topic Naming
> >> Abilities
> >> [ARTEMIS-1548] - Support CRL
> >> [ARTEMIS-1550] - Support LVQ for OpenWire
> >> [ARTEMIS-1600] - Support masked passwords in bootstrap.xm and
> login.config
> >> [ARTEMIS-1623] - create an ActiveMQServerPlugin for logging various
> >> broker events
> >> [ARTEMIS-1649] - enable openssl provider for Netty
> >> [ARTEMIS-1661] - Enable splitting of broker.xml into multiple files
> >> [ARTEMIS-1663] - Add enhanced message count and size metrics for Queues
> >>
> >>
> >> Given the length of this release, please refer to JIRA for the
> >> complete report of fixes included on 2.5.0:
> >>
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> projectId=12315920&version=12342127
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Source and binary distributions can be found here:
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-artemis/2.5.0
> >>
> >>
> >> The Maven repository is here:
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacheactivemq-1156
> >>
> >>
> >> In case you want to give it a try with the maven repo on examples:
> >>
> >> http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/docs/latest/hacking-
> guide/validating-releases.html
> >>
> >>
> >> The source tag:
> >>
> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-artemis.
> git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/2.5.0
> >>
> >> I will update the website after the vote has passed.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> [ ] +1 approve the release as Apache Artemis 2.4.0
> >> [ ] +0 no opinion
> >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >>
> >> Here's my +1
> >>
> >
> > +1
> >
> > * Validated license and notice files
> > * Validated signatures and checksums
> > * Ran the binary broker and ran some AMQP sample applications against it
> > * Built from source and ran some of the tests
> > * Ran mvn -P release apache-rat:check to validate source files had
> license
> > headers
> >
> > --
> > Tim Bish
> > twitter: @tabish121
> > blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
> >
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.5.0

nigro_franz
+1

Compiled and run some tests on it


Il giorno mer 14 mar 2018 alle ore 10:46 Dejan Bosanac <[hidden email]>
ha scritto:

> +1
>
> Regards
> --
> Dejan Bosanac
> http://sensatic.net/about
>
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 12:25 AM, Christopher Shannon <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 4:05 PM, Timothy Bish <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > > On 03/12/2018 04:40 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.5.0 release.
> > >>
> > >> This is a great release, with 190 tasks completed including bug fixes,
> > >> improvements, new features and additional tasks. I really appreciate
> > >> everyone's contribution on making this happening. Thank you so much!
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> I would like to highlight the features introduced on this release:
> > >>
> > >> [ARTEMIS-853] - Support for exclusive consumers
> > >> [ARTEMIS-1030] - Support equivilent ActiveMQ 5.x Virtual Topic Naming
> > >> Abilities
> > >> [ARTEMIS-1548] - Support CRL
> > >> [ARTEMIS-1550] - Support LVQ for OpenWire
> > >> [ARTEMIS-1600] - Support masked passwords in bootstrap.xm and
> > login.config
> > >> [ARTEMIS-1623] - create an ActiveMQServerPlugin for logging various
> > >> broker events
> > >> [ARTEMIS-1649] - enable openssl provider for Netty
> > >> [ARTEMIS-1661] - Enable splitting of broker.xml into multiple files
> > >> [ARTEMIS-1663] - Add enhanced message count and size metrics for
> Queues
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Given the length of this release, please refer to JIRA for the
> > >> complete report of fixes included on 2.5.0:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> > projectId=12315920&version=12342127
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Source and binary distributions can be found here:
> > >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-artemis/2.5.0
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> The Maven repository is here:
> > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > orgapacheactivemq-1156
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> In case you want to give it a try with the maven repo on examples:
> > >>
> > >> http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/docs/latest/hacking-
> > guide/validating-releases.html
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> The source tag:
> > >>
> > >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-artemis.
> > git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/2.5.0
> > >>
> > >> I will update the website after the vote has passed.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> [ ] +1 approve the release as Apache Artemis 2.4.0
> > >> [ ] +0 no opinion
> > >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > >>
> > >> Here's my +1
> > >>
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > * Validated license and notice files
> > > * Validated signatures and checksums
> > > * Ran the binary broker and ran some AMQP sample applications against
> it
> > > * Built from source and ran some of the tests
> > > * Ran mvn -P release apache-rat:check to validate source files had
> > license
> > > headers
> > >
> > > --
> > > Tim Bish
> > > twitter: @tabish121
> > > blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
> > >
> >
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.5.0

MichaelAndrePearce
We’ve spotted a nasty issue, I’m trying to put an integration test together to have recreatable the problem, but taking me some time.

Can you give me another 24hours? To create the test to share then for you to decide if the issue is blocking or not.



Sent from my iPhone

> On 14 Mar 2018, at 09:50, Francesco Nigro <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Compiled and run some tests on it
>
>
> Il giorno mer 14 mar 2018 alle ore 10:46 Dejan Bosanac <[hidden email]>
> ha scritto:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Regards
>> --
>> Dejan Bosanac
>> http://sensatic.net/about
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 12:25 AM, Christopher Shannon <
>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 4:05 PM, Timothy Bish <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>>> On 03/12/2018 04:40 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.5.0 release.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is a great release, with 190 tasks completed including bug fixes,
>>>>> improvements, new features and additional tasks. I really appreciate
>>>>> everyone's contribution on making this happening. Thank you so much!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to highlight the features introduced on this release:
>>>>>
>>>>> [ARTEMIS-853] - Support for exclusive consumers
>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1030] - Support equivilent ActiveMQ 5.x Virtual Topic Naming
>>>>> Abilities
>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1548] - Support CRL
>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1550] - Support LVQ for OpenWire
>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1600] - Support masked passwords in bootstrap.xm and
>>> login.config
>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1623] - create an ActiveMQServerPlugin for logging various
>>>>> broker events
>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1649] - enable openssl provider for Netty
>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1661] - Enable splitting of broker.xml into multiple files
>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1663] - Add enhanced message count and size metrics for
>> Queues
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Given the length of this release, please refer to JIRA for the
>>>>> complete report of fixes included on 2.5.0:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
>>> projectId=12315920&version=12342127
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Source and binary distributions can be found here:
>>>>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-artemis/2.5.0
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The Maven repository is here:
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>> orgapacheactivemq-1156
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> In case you want to give it a try with the maven repo on examples:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/docs/latest/hacking-
>>> guide/validating-releases.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The source tag:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-artemis.
>>> git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/2.5.0
>>>>>
>>>>> I will update the website after the vote has passed.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] +1 approve the release as Apache Artemis 2.4.0
>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's my +1
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> * Validated license and notice files
>>>> * Validated signatures and checksums
>>>> * Ran the binary broker and ran some AMQP sample applications against
>> it
>>>> * Built from source and ran some of the tests
>>>> * Ran mvn -P release apache-rat:check to validate source files had
>>> license
>>>> headers
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Tim Bish
>>>> twitter: @tabish121
>>>> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
>>>>
>>>
>>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.5.0

MichaelAndrePearce
Hi again,
 
So I have managed to create an integration test that re-creates the problem.
https://github.com/michaelandrepearce/activemq-artemis/tree/NetworkHealthCheckIssue
 
Essentially when NetworkHealthCheck detects network failure issue, the server is stopped, once the network issue is resolved, it obviously detects this and restart the server again.
 
If prior to the network issue, a change validly is made (as we support reloading these sections) to broker.xml is made for address-settings, security-settings, address’s or queue’s these are lost when the server is restarted, when the above occurs.
 
During the initialization stage it seems the broker is resetting it configured state back to the config that was very first loaded, not the config that was last/most recently reloaded.
 
This in my view is a blocker as essentially broker is losing changed configured state and can cause obvious issues, when intermittent network issues occur, which in any system is likely at some point, either in disaster or network maintenance.
 
Cheers
Mike

Sent from my iPhone

> On 14 Mar 2018, at 21:02, Michael André Pearce <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> We’ve spotted a nasty issue, I’m trying to put an integration test together to have recreatable the problem, but taking me some time.
>
> Can you give me another 24hours? To create the test to share then for you to decide if the issue is blocking or not.
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On 14 Mar 2018, at 09:50, Francesco Nigro <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Compiled and run some tests on it
>>
>>
>> Il giorno mer 14 mar 2018 alle ore 10:46 Dejan Bosanac <[hidden email]>
>> ha scritto:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> --
>>> Dejan Bosanac
>>> http://sensatic.net/about
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 12:25 AM, Christopher Shannon <
>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 4:05 PM, Timothy Bish <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>> On 03/12/2018 04:40 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.5.0 release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is a great release, with 190 tasks completed including bug fixes,
>>>>>> improvements, new features and additional tasks. I really appreciate
>>>>>> everyone's contribution on making this happening. Thank you so much!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would like to highlight the features introduced on this release:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [ARTEMIS-853] - Support for exclusive consumers
>>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1030] - Support equivilent ActiveMQ 5.x Virtual Topic Naming
>>>>>> Abilities
>>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1548] - Support CRL
>>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1550] - Support LVQ for OpenWire
>>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1600] - Support masked passwords in bootstrap.xm and
>>>> login.config
>>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1623] - create an ActiveMQServerPlugin for logging various
>>>>>> broker events
>>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1649] - enable openssl provider for Netty
>>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1661] - Enable splitting of broker.xml into multiple files
>>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1663] - Add enhanced message count and size metrics for
>>> Queues
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Given the length of this release, please refer to JIRA for the
>>>>>> complete report of fixes included on 2.5.0:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
>>>> projectId=12315920&version=12342127
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Source and binary distributions can be found here:
>>>>>>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-artemis/2.5.0
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Maven repository is here:
>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>> orgapacheactivemq-1156
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In case you want to give it a try with the maven repo on examples:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/docs/latest/hacking-
>>>> guide/validating-releases.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The source tag:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-artemis.
>>>> git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/2.5.0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I will update the website after the vote has passed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [ ] +1 approve the release as Apache Artemis 2.4.0
>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here's my +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> * Validated license and notice files
>>>>> * Validated signatures and checksums
>>>>> * Ran the binary broker and ran some AMQP sample applications against
>>> it
>>>>> * Built from source and ran some of the tests
>>>>> * Ran mvn -P release apache-rat:check to validate source files had
>>>> license
>>>>> headers
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Tim Bish
>>>>> twitter: @tabish121
>>>>> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.5.0

jbertram
So is this a regression or a new issue?  If it's a regression then I think
it should be fixed.  If it's a new issue then I think it should go in 2.5.1
in short order.


Justin

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 5:23 PM, Michael André Pearce <
[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi again,
>
> So I have managed to create an integration test that re-creates the
> problem.
> https://github.com/michaelandrepearce/activemq-artemis/tree/
> NetworkHealthCheckIssue
>
> Essentially when NetworkHealthCheck detects network failure issue, the
> server is stopped, once the network issue is resolved, it obviously detects
> this and restart the server again.
>
> If prior to the network issue, a change validly is made (as we support
> reloading these sections) to broker.xml is made for address-settings,
> security-settings, address’s or queue’s these are lost when the server is
> restarted, when the above occurs.
>
> During the initialization stage it seems the broker is resetting it
> configured state back to the config that was very first loaded, not the
> config that was last/most recently reloaded.
>
> This in my view is a blocker as essentially broker is losing changed
> configured state and can cause obvious issues, when intermittent network
> issues occur, which in any system is likely at some point, either in
> disaster or network maintenance.
>
> Cheers
> Mike
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On 14 Mar 2018, at 21:02, Michael André Pearce <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > We’ve spotted a nasty issue, I’m trying to put an integration test
> together to have recreatable the problem, but taking me some time.
> >
> > Can you give me another 24hours? To create the test to share then for
> you to decide if the issue is blocking or not.
> >
> >
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> >> On 14 Mar 2018, at 09:50, Francesco Nigro <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >> Compiled and run some tests on it
> >>
> >>
> >> Il giorno mer 14 mar 2018 alle ore 10:46 Dejan Bosanac <
> [hidden email]>
> >> ha scritto:
> >>
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>> --
> >>> Dejan Bosanac
> >>> http://sensatic.net/about
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 12:25 AM, Christopher Shannon <
> >>> [hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> +1
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 4:05 PM, Timothy Bish <[hidden email]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>> On 03/12/2018 04:40 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.5.0 release.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This is a great release, with 190 tasks completed including bug
> fixes,
> >>>>>> improvements, new features and additional tasks. I really appreciate
> >>>>>> everyone's contribution on making this happening. Thank you so much!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I would like to highlight the features introduced on this release:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [ARTEMIS-853] - Support for exclusive consumers
> >>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1030] - Support equivilent ActiveMQ 5.x Virtual Topic
> Naming
> >>>>>> Abilities
> >>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1548] - Support CRL
> >>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1550] - Support LVQ for OpenWire
> >>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1600] - Support masked passwords in bootstrap.xm and
> >>>> login.config
> >>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1623] - create an ActiveMQServerPlugin for logging various
> >>>>>> broker events
> >>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1649] - enable openssl provider for Netty
> >>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1661] - Enable splitting of broker.xml into multiple files
> >>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1663] - Add enhanced message count and size metrics for
> >>> Queues
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Given the length of this release, please refer to JIRA for the
> >>>>>> complete report of fixes included on 2.5.0:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> >>>> projectId=12315920&version=12342127
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Source and binary distributions can be found here:
> >>>>>>
> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-artemis/2.5.0
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The Maven repository is here:
> >>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >>>> orgapacheactivemq-1156
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> In case you want to give it a try with the maven repo on examples:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/docs/latest/hacking-
> >>>> guide/validating-releases.html
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The source tag:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-artemis.
> >>>> git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/2.5.0
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I will update the website after the vote has passed.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [ ] +1 approve the release as Apache Artemis 2.4.0
> >>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> >>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Here's my +1
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +1
> >>>>>
> >>>>> * Validated license and notice files
> >>>>> * Validated signatures and checksums
> >>>>> * Ran the binary broker and ran some AMQP sample applications against
> >>> it
> >>>>> * Built from source and ran some of the tests
> >>>>> * Ran mvn -P release apache-rat:check to validate source files had
> >>>> license
> >>>>> headers
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Tim Bish
> >>>>> twitter: @tabish121
> >>>>> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.5.0

christopher.l.shannon
Agree with Justin, I wouldn't stop this release unless it is a
regression caused since 2.4.0.  We can always do bug fix releases even
if they only contain a couple of fixes if they are of high importance.

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 7:09 PM, Justin Bertram <[hidden email]> wrote:

> So is this a regression or a new issue?  If it's a regression then I think
> it should be fixed.  If it's a new issue then I think it should go in 2.5.1
> in short order.
>
>
> Justin
>
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 5:23 PM, Michael André Pearce <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Hi again,
>>
>> So I have managed to create an integration test that re-creates the
>> problem.
>> https://github.com/michaelandrepearce/activemq-artemis/tree/
>> NetworkHealthCheckIssue
>>
>> Essentially when NetworkHealthCheck detects network failure issue, the
>> server is stopped, once the network issue is resolved, it obviously detects
>> this and restart the server again.
>>
>> If prior to the network issue, a change validly is made (as we support
>> reloading these sections) to broker.xml is made for address-settings,
>> security-settings, address’s or queue’s these are lost when the server is
>> restarted, when the above occurs.
>>
>> During the initialization stage it seems the broker is resetting it
>> configured state back to the config that was very first loaded, not the
>> config that was last/most recently reloaded.
>>
>> This in my view is a blocker as essentially broker is losing changed
>> configured state and can cause obvious issues, when intermittent network
>> issues occur, which in any system is likely at some point, either in
>> disaster or network maintenance.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Mike
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> > On 14 Mar 2018, at 21:02, Michael André Pearce <
>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>> >
>> > We’ve spotted a nasty issue, I’m trying to put an integration test
>> together to have recreatable the problem, but taking me some time.
>> >
>> > Can you give me another 24hours? To create the test to share then for
>> you to decide if the issue is blocking or not.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Sent from my iPhone
>> >
>> >> On 14 Mar 2018, at 09:50, Francesco Nigro <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> +1
>> >>
>> >> Compiled and run some tests on it
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Il giorno mer 14 mar 2018 alle ore 10:46 Dejan Bosanac <
>> [hidden email]>
>> >> ha scritto:
>> >>
>> >>> +1
>> >>>
>> >>> Regards
>> >>> --
>> >>> Dejan Bosanac
>> >>> http://sensatic.net/about
>> >>>
>> >>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 12:25 AM, Christopher Shannon <
>> >>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> +1
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 4:05 PM, Timothy Bish <[hidden email]>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>>> On 03/12/2018 04:40 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.5.0 release.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> This is a great release, with 190 tasks completed including bug
>> fixes,
>> >>>>>> improvements, new features and additional tasks. I really appreciate
>> >>>>>> everyone's contribution on making this happening. Thank you so much!
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> I would like to highlight the features introduced on this release:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> [ARTEMIS-853] - Support for exclusive consumers
>> >>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1030] - Support equivilent ActiveMQ 5.x Virtual Topic
>> Naming
>> >>>>>> Abilities
>> >>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1548] - Support CRL
>> >>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1550] - Support LVQ for OpenWire
>> >>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1600] - Support masked passwords in bootstrap.xm and
>> >>>> login.config
>> >>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1623] - create an ActiveMQServerPlugin for logging various
>> >>>>>> broker events
>> >>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1649] - enable openssl provider for Netty
>> >>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1661] - Enable splitting of broker.xml into multiple files
>> >>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1663] - Add enhanced message count and size metrics for
>> >>> Queues
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Given the length of this release, please refer to JIRA for the
>> >>>>>> complete report of fixes included on 2.5.0:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
>> >>>> projectId=12315920&version=12342127
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Source and binary distributions can be found here:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-artemis/2.5.0
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> The Maven repository is here:
>> >>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>> >>>> orgapacheactivemq-1156
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> In case you want to give it a try with the maven repo on examples:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/docs/latest/hacking-
>> >>>> guide/validating-releases.html
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> The source tag:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-artemis.
>> >>>> git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/2.5.0
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> I will update the website after the vote has passed.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> [ ] +1 approve the release as Apache Artemis 2.4.0
>> >>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> >>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Here's my +1
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> +1
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> * Validated license and notice files
>> >>>>> * Validated signatures and checksums
>> >>>>> * Ran the binary broker and ran some AMQP sample applications against
>> >>> it
>> >>>>> * Built from source and ran some of the tests
>> >>>>> * Ran mvn -P release apache-rat:check to validate source files had
>> >>>> license
>> >>>>> headers
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> --
>> >>>>> Tim Bish
>> >>>>> twitter: @tabish121
>> >>>>> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.5.0

clebertsuconic
It’s not a regression.  I don’t think so.

I say we release against in 1 or 2 weeks with 2.5.1.

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 7:55 PM Christopher Shannon <
[hidden email]> wrote:

> Agree with Justin, I wouldn't stop this release unless it is a
> regression caused since 2.4.0.  We can always do bug fix releases even
> if they only contain a couple of fixes if they are of high importance.
>
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 7:09 PM, Justin Bertram <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > So is this a regression or a new issue?  If it's a regression then I
> think
> > it should be fixed.  If it's a new issue then I think it should go in
> 2.5.1
> > in short order.
> >
> >
> > Justin
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 5:23 PM, Michael André Pearce <
> > [hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi again,
> >>
> >> So I have managed to create an integration test that re-creates the
> >> problem.
> >> https://github.com/michaelandrepearce/activemq-artemis/tree/
> >> NetworkHealthCheckIssue
> >>
> >> Essentially when NetworkHealthCheck detects network failure issue, the
> >> server is stopped, once the network issue is resolved, it obviously
> detects
> >> this and restart the server again.
> >>
> >> If prior to the network issue, a change validly is made (as we support
> >> reloading these sections) to broker.xml is made for address-settings,
> >> security-settings, address’s or queue’s these are lost when the server
> is
> >> restarted, when the above occurs.
> >>
> >> During the initialization stage it seems the broker is resetting it
> >> configured state back to the config that was very first loaded, not the
> >> config that was last/most recently reloaded.
> >>
> >> This in my view is a blocker as essentially broker is losing changed
> >> configured state and can cause obvious issues, when intermittent network
> >> issues occur, which in any system is likely at some point, either in
> >> disaster or network maintenance.
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >> Mike
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPhone
> >>
> >> > On 14 Mar 2018, at 21:02, Michael André Pearce <
> >> [hidden email]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > We’ve spotted a nasty issue, I’m trying to put an integration test
> >> together to have recreatable the problem, but taking me some time.
> >> >
> >> > Can you give me another 24hours? To create the test to share then for
> >> you to decide if the issue is blocking or not.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Sent from my iPhone
> >> >
> >> >> On 14 Mar 2018, at 09:50, Francesco Nigro <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> +1
> >> >>
> >> >> Compiled and run some tests on it
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Il giorno mer 14 mar 2018 alle ore 10:46 Dejan Bosanac <
> >> [hidden email]>
> >> >> ha scritto:
> >> >>
> >> >>> +1
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Regards
> >> >>> --
> >> >>> Dejan Bosanac
> >> >>> http://sensatic.net/about
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 12:25 AM, Christopher Shannon <
> >> >>> [hidden email]> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> +1
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 4:05 PM, Timothy Bish <[hidden email]
> >
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>>>> On 03/12/2018 04:40 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.5.0 release.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> This is a great release, with 190 tasks completed including bug
> >> fixes,
> >> >>>>>> improvements, new features and additional tasks. I really
> appreciate
> >> >>>>>> everyone's contribution on making this happening. Thank you so
> much!
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> I would like to highlight the features introduced on this
> release:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> [ARTEMIS-853] - Support for exclusive consumers
> >> >>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1030] - Support equivilent ActiveMQ 5.x Virtual Topic
> >> Naming
> >> >>>>>> Abilities
> >> >>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1548] - Support CRL
> >> >>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1550] - Support LVQ for OpenWire
> >> >>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1600] - Support masked passwords in bootstrap.xm and
> >> >>>> login.config
> >> >>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1623] - create an ActiveMQServerPlugin for logging
> various
> >> >>>>>> broker events
> >> >>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1649] - enable openssl provider for Netty
> >> >>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1661] - Enable splitting of broker.xml into multiple
> files
> >> >>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1663] - Add enhanced message count and size metrics for
> >> >>> Queues
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Given the length of this release, please refer to JIRA for the
> >> >>>>>> complete report of fixes included on 2.5.0:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> >> >>>> projectId=12315920&version=12342127
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Source and binary distributions can be found here:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-artemis/2.5.0
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> The Maven repository is here:
> >> >>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >> >>>> orgapacheactivemq-1156
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> In case you want to give it a try with the maven repo on
> examples:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/docs/latest/hacking-
> >> >>>> guide/validating-releases.html
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> The source tag:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-artemis.
> >> >>>> git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/2.5.0
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> I will update the website after the vote has passed.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> [ ] +1 approve the release as Apache Artemis 2.4.0
> >> >>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> >> >>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Here's my +1
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> +1
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> * Validated license and notice files
> >> >>>>> * Validated signatures and checksums
> >> >>>>> * Ran the binary broker and ran some AMQP sample applications
> against
> >> >>> it
> >> >>>>> * Built from source and ran some of the tests
> >> >>>>> * Ran mvn -P release apache-rat:check to validate source files had
> >> >>>> license
> >> >>>>> headers
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> --
> >> >>>>> Tim Bish
> >> >>>>> twitter: @tabish121
> >> >>>>> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>
> >>
>
--
Clebert Suconic
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.5.0

MichaelAndrePearce
To confirm this isn’t a regression (we have report this morning issue was also seen in our TEST and UAT env running older version m) just unfortunate timing in we saw this issue whilst testing the release candidate making last night us think it was related to latest code.

As such +1 rc and +1 doing a point release shortly after.

Sent from my iPhone

> On 15 Mar 2018, at 03:16, Clebert Suconic <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> It’s not a regression.  I don’t think so.
>
> I say we release against in 1 or 2 weeks with 2.5.1.
>
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 7:55 PM Christopher Shannon <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Agree with Justin, I wouldn't stop this release unless it is a
>> regression caused since 2.4.0.  We can always do bug fix releases even
>> if they only contain a couple of fixes if they are of high importance.
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 7:09 PM, Justin Bertram <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>> So is this a regression or a new issue?  If it's a regression then I
>> think
>>> it should be fixed.  If it's a new issue then I think it should go in
>> 2.5.1
>>> in short order.
>>>
>>>
>>> Justin
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 5:23 PM, Michael André Pearce <
>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi again,
>>>>
>>>> So I have managed to create an integration test that re-creates the
>>>> problem.
>>>> https://github.com/michaelandrepearce/activemq-artemis/tree/
>>>> NetworkHealthCheckIssue
>>>>
>>>> Essentially when NetworkHealthCheck detects network failure issue, the
>>>> server is stopped, once the network issue is resolved, it obviously
>> detects
>>>> this and restart the server again.
>>>>
>>>> If prior to the network issue, a change validly is made (as we support
>>>> reloading these sections) to broker.xml is made for address-settings,
>>>> security-settings, address’s or queue’s these are lost when the server
>> is
>>>> restarted, when the above occurs.
>>>>
>>>> During the initialization stage it seems the broker is resetting it
>>>> configured state back to the config that was very first loaded, not the
>>>> config that was last/most recently reloaded.
>>>>
>>>> This in my view is a blocker as essentially broker is losing changed
>>>> configured state and can cause obvious issues, when intermittent network
>>>> issues occur, which in any system is likely at some point, either in
>>>> disaster or network maintenance.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Mike
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>
>>>>> On 14 Mar 2018, at 21:02, Michael André Pearce <
>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> We’ve spotted a nasty issue, I’m trying to put an integration test
>>>> together to have recreatable the problem, but taking me some time.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you give me another 24hours? To create the test to share then for
>>>> you to decide if the issue is blocking or not.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 14 Mar 2018, at 09:50, Francesco Nigro <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Compiled and run some tests on it
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Il giorno mer 14 mar 2018 alle ore 10:46 Dejan Bosanac <
>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>> ha scritto:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Dejan Bosanac
>>>>>>> http://sensatic.net/about
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 12:25 AM, Christopher Shannon <
>>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 4:05 PM, Timothy Bish <[hidden email]
>>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 03/12/2018 04:40 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.5.0 release.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This is a great release, with 190 tasks completed including bug
>>>> fixes,
>>>>>>>>>> improvements, new features and additional tasks. I really
>> appreciate
>>>>>>>>>> everyone's contribution on making this happening. Thank you so
>> much!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I would like to highlight the features introduced on this
>> release:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [ARTEMIS-853] - Support for exclusive consumers
>>>>>>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1030] - Support equivilent ActiveMQ 5.x Virtual Topic
>>>> Naming
>>>>>>>>>> Abilities
>>>>>>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1548] - Support CRL
>>>>>>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1550] - Support LVQ for OpenWire
>>>>>>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1600] - Support masked passwords in bootstrap.xm and
>>>>>>>> login.config
>>>>>>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1623] - create an ActiveMQServerPlugin for logging
>> various
>>>>>>>>>> broker events
>>>>>>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1649] - enable openssl provider for Netty
>>>>>>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1661] - Enable splitting of broker.xml into multiple
>> files
>>>>>>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1663] - Add enhanced message count and size metrics for
>>>>>>> Queues
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Given the length of this release, please refer to JIRA for the
>>>>>>>>>> complete report of fixes included on 2.5.0:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
>>>>>>>> projectId=12315920&version=12342127
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Source and binary distributions can be found here:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-artemis/2.5.0
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The Maven repository is here:
>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>>>> orgapacheactivemq-1156
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In case you want to give it a try with the maven repo on
>> examples:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/docs/latest/hacking-
>>>>>>>> guide/validating-releases.html
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The source tag:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-artemis.
>>>>>>>> git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/2.5.0
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I will update the website after the vote has passed.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 approve the release as Apache Artemis 2.4.0
>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Here's my +1
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> * Validated license and notice files
>>>>>>>>> * Validated signatures and checksums
>>>>>>>>> * Ran the binary broker and ran some AMQP sample applications
>> against
>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>> * Built from source and ran some of the tests
>>>>>>>>> * Ran mvn -P release apache-rat:check to validate source files had
>>>>>>>> license
>>>>>>>>> headers
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Tim Bish
>>>>>>>>> twitter: @tabish121
>>>>>>>>> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
> --
> Clebert Suconic