Twitter

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
19 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Twitter

MichaelAndrePearce
Hi All,

I would like to create an apacheactivemq twitter account, to increase the presence there. Similar to other Apache projects have.

It is possible to make a group account so would propose in the account I would add all known committers tweet accounts to it, I believe all become admin on doing this to avoid one person being admin, (and simply if I miss you/don't know your tweet handle just msg to get added if committer)

The idea is we can tweet about releases, blogs, features and retweet of anything activemq.

Before doing this I want to check there is no strong objections, as noted many other apache projects already do this. If none I would look to setup end of the week.

Cheers
Mike



Sent from my iPad
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Twitter

Jean-Baptiste Onofré
No objection from my side.

Regards
JB

On Nov 1, 2017, 07:07, at 07:07, "Michael André Pearce" <[hidden email]> wrote:

>Hi All,
>
>I would like to create an apacheactivemq twitter account, to increase
>the presence there. Similar to other Apache projects have.
>
>It is possible to make a group account so would propose in the account
>I would add all known committers tweet accounts to it, I believe all
>become admin on doing this to avoid one person being admin, (and simply
>if I miss you/don't know your tweet handle just msg to get added if
>committer)
>
>The idea is we can tweet about releases, blogs, features and retweet of
>anything activemq.
>
>Before doing this I want to check there is no strong objections, as
>noted many other apache projects already do this. If none I would look
>to setup end of the week.
>
>Cheers
>Mike
>
>
>
>Sent from my iPad
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Twitter

clebertsuconic
+1

On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[hidden email]> wrote:

> No objection from my side.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Nov 1, 2017, 07:07, at 07:07, "Michael André Pearce" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>Hi All,
>>
>>I would like to create an apacheactivemq twitter account, to increase
>>the presence there. Similar to other Apache projects have.
>>
>>It is possible to make a group account so would propose in the account
>>I would add all known committers tweet accounts to it, I believe all
>>become admin on doing this to avoid one person being admin, (and simply
>>if I miss you/don't know your tweet handle just msg to get added if
>>committer)
>>
>>The idea is we can tweet about releases, blogs, features and retweet of
>>anything activemq.
>>
>>Before doing this I want to check there is no strong objections, as
>>noted many other apache projects already do this. If none I would look
>>to setup end of the week.
>>
>>Cheers
>>Mike
>>
>>
>>
>>Sent from my iPad



--
Clebert Suconic
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Twitter

christopher.l.shannon
+1

On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Clebert Suconic <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> +1
>
> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > No objection from my side.
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> > On Nov 1, 2017, 07:07, at 07:07, "Michael André Pearce" <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
> >>Hi All,
> >>
> >>I would like to create an apacheactivemq twitter account, to increase
> >>the presence there. Similar to other Apache projects have.
> >>
> >>It is possible to make a group account so would propose in the account
> >>I would add all known committers tweet accounts to it, I believe all
> >>become admin on doing this to avoid one person being admin, (and simply
> >>if I miss you/don't know your tweet handle just msg to get added if
> >>committer)
> >>
> >>The idea is we can tweet about releases, blogs, features and retweet of
> >>anything activemq.
> >>
> >>Before doing this I want to check there is no strong objections, as
> >>noted many other apache projects already do this. If none I would look
> >>to setup end of the week.
> >>
> >>Cheers
> >>Mike
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Sent from my iPad
>
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Twitter

tabish121@gmail.com
Any official project social media account needs to be under control the
project PMC, refer to
https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/socialmedia

On 11/01/2017 09:22 AM, Christopher Shannon wrote:

> +1
>
> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Clebert Suconic <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>> No objection from my side.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On Nov 1, 2017, 07:07, at 07:07, "Michael André Pearce" <
>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> I would like to create an apacheactivemq twitter account, to increase
>>>> the presence there. Similar to other Apache projects have.
>>>>
>>>> It is possible to make a group account so would propose in the account
>>>> I would add all known committers tweet accounts to it, I believe all
>>>> become admin on doing this to avoid one person being admin, (and simply
>>>> if I miss you/don't know your tweet handle just msg to get added if
>>>> committer)
>>>>
>>>> The idea is we can tweet about releases, blogs, features and retweet of
>>>> anything activemq.
>>>>
>>>> Before doing this I want to check there is no strong objections, as
>>>> noted many other apache projects already do this. If none I would look
>>>> to setup end of the week.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Mike
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>>
>> --
>> Clebert Suconic
>>

--
Tim Bish
twitter: @tabish121
blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Twitter

MichaelAndrePearce
Yes, I would set it up sort it out then finally transfer the owner to private mail list so pmc have control

Sent from my iPhone

> On 1 Nov 2017, at 13:36, Timothy Bish <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Any official project social media account needs to be under control the project PMC, refer to
> https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/socialmedia
>
>> On 11/01/2017 09:22 AM, Christopher Shannon wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Clebert Suconic <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>>> No objection from my side.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>>
>>>> On Nov 1, 2017, 07:07, at 07:07, "Michael André Pearce" <
>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to create an apacheactivemq twitter account, to increase
>>>>> the presence there. Similar to other Apache projects have.
>>>>>
>>>>> It is possible to make a group account so would propose in the account
>>>>> I would add all known committers tweet accounts to it, I believe all
>>>>> become admin on doing this to avoid one person being admin, (and simply
>>>>> if I miss you/don't know your tweet handle just msg to get added if
>>>>> committer)
>>>>>
>>>>> The idea is we can tweet about releases, blogs, features and retweet of
>>>>> anything activemq.
>>>>>
>>>>> Before doing this I want to check there is no strong objections, as
>>>>> noted many other apache projects already do this. If none I would look
>>>>> to setup end of the week.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> Mike
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Clebert Suconic
>>>
>
> --
> Tim Bish
> twitter: @tabish121
> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Twitter

MichaelAndrePearce
Twitter for a group account has a nice level of owner, admin and user, that means committers can login with their own accounts and no one need the master/owners password for day to day, the owner account just needed to reset bits if ever needed.

Owner = private pmc email (once we’ve setup all, this is easy to transfer)



Sent from my iPhone

> On 1 Nov 2017, at 16:19, Michael André Pearce <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Yes, I would set it up sort it out then finally transfer the owner to private mail list so pmc have control
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 13:36, Timothy Bish <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> Any official project social media account needs to be under control the project PMC, refer to
>> https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/socialmedia
>>
>>> On 11/01/2017 09:22 AM, Christopher Shannon wrote:
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Clebert Suconic <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[hidden email]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> No objection from my side.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> JB
>>>>>
>>>>> On Nov 1, 2017, 07:07, at 07:07, "Michael André Pearce" <
>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would like to create an apacheactivemq twitter account, to increase
>>>>>> the presence there. Similar to other Apache projects have.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is possible to make a group account so would propose in the account
>>>>>> I would add all known committers tweet accounts to it, I believe all
>>>>>> become admin on doing this to avoid one person being admin, (and simply
>>>>>> if I miss you/don't know your tweet handle just msg to get added if
>>>>>> committer)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The idea is we can tweet about releases, blogs, features and retweet of
>>>>>> anything activemq.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Before doing this I want to check there is no strong objections, as
>>>>>> noted many other apache projects already do this. If none I would look
>>>>>> to setup end of the week.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>> Mike
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Clebert Suconic
>>>>
>>
>> --
>> Tim Bish
>> twitter: @tabish121
>> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
>>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Twitter

MichaelAndrePearce
I have sent a mail to the PMC. But in the interest of being open, will share on the Dev mail list also.

We are slowly setting this up to check all would work etc etc.

We have set the “owner” account to the private pmc mail address as per Apache guidelines, it seems there might be some filter on the private mail list as it seems the verify email from twitter is not received.

I have such asked for advice from the PMC.

Incase anyone has done this for other Apache projects and have some advice how they handled this or get the verify email, it is welcome.

Cheers
Mike

Sent from my iPhone

> On 1 Nov 2017, at 16:34, Michael André Pearce <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Twitter for a group account has a nice level of owner, admin and user, that means committers can login with their own accounts and no one need the master/owners password for day to day, the owner account just needed to reset bits if ever needed.
>
> Owner = private pmc email (once we’ve setup all, this is easy to transfer)
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 16:19, Michael André Pearce <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> Yes, I would set it up sort it out then finally transfer the owner to private mail list so pmc have control
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 13:36, Timothy Bish <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Any official project social media account needs to be under control the project PMC, refer to
>>> https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/socialmedia
>>>
>>>> On 11/01/2017 09:22 AM, Christopher Shannon wrote:
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Clebert Suconic <[hidden email]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[hidden email]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> No objection from my side.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Nov 1, 2017, 07:07, at 07:07, "Michael André Pearce" <
>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would like to create an apacheactivemq twitter account, to increase
>>>>>>> the presence there. Similar to other Apache projects have.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It is possible to make a group account so would propose in the account
>>>>>>> I would add all known committers tweet accounts to it, I believe all
>>>>>>> become admin on doing this to avoid one person being admin, (and simply
>>>>>>> if I miss you/don't know your tweet handle just msg to get added if
>>>>>>> committer)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The idea is we can tweet about releases, blogs, features and retweet of
>>>>>>> anything activemq.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Before doing this I want to check there is no strong objections, as
>>>>>>> noted many other apache projects already do this. If none I would look
>>>>>>> to setup end of the week.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>> Mike
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Clebert Suconic
>>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Tim Bish
>>> twitter: @tabish121
>>> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
>>>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Twitter

MichaelAndrePearce
Also a shout out for committers and pmc, if you want to be added as we set this up we will need your twitter handles (I have some peoples but not all)

Cheers
Mike

Sent from my iPhone

> On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:11, Michael André Pearce <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> I have sent a mail to the PMC. But in the interest of being open, will share on the Dev mail list also.
>
> We are slowly setting this up to check all would work etc etc.
>
> We have set the “owner” account to the private pmc mail address as per Apache guidelines, it seems there might be some filter on the private mail list as it seems the verify email from twitter is not received.
>
> I have such asked for advice from the PMC.
>
> Incase anyone has done this for other Apache projects and have some advice how they handled this or get the verify email, it is welcome.
>
> Cheers
> Mike
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 16:34, Michael André Pearce <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> Twitter for a group account has a nice level of owner, admin and user, that means committers can login with their own accounts and no one need the master/owners password for day to day, the owner account just needed to reset bits if ever needed.
>>
>> Owner = private pmc email (once we’ve setup all, this is easy to transfer)
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 16:19, Michael André Pearce <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes, I would set it up sort it out then finally transfer the owner to private mail list so pmc have control
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 13:36, Timothy Bish <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Any official project social media account needs to be under control the project PMC, refer to
>>>> https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/socialmedia
>>>>
>>>>> On 11/01/2017 09:22 AM, Christopher Shannon wrote:
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Clebert Suconic <[hidden email]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[hidden email]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> No objection from my side.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Nov 1, 2017, 07:07, at 07:07, "Michael André Pearce" <
>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I would like to create an apacheactivemq twitter account, to increase
>>>>>>>> the presence there. Similar to other Apache projects have.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It is possible to make a group account so would propose in the account
>>>>>>>> I would add all known committers tweet accounts to it, I believe all
>>>>>>>> become admin on doing this to avoid one person being admin, (and simply
>>>>>>>> if I miss you/don't know your tweet handle just msg to get added if
>>>>>>>> committer)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The idea is we can tweet about releases, blogs, features and retweet of
>>>>>>>> anything activemq.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Before doing this I want to check there is no strong objections, as
>>>>>>>> noted many other apache projects already do this. If none I would look
>>>>>>>> to setup end of the week.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>> Mike
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Clebert Suconic
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Tim Bish
>>>> twitter: @tabish121
>>>> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
>>>>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Twitter

tabish121@gmail.com
On 11/01/2017 06:13 PM, Michael André Pearce wrote:
> Also a shout out for committers and pmc, if you want to be added as we set this up we will need your twitter handles (I have some peoples but not all)

Ultimately the PMC needs to decide which committers would be given
access as per the Apache social media policy.

>
> Cheers
> Mike
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:11, Michael André Pearce <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> I have sent a mail to the PMC. But in the interest of being open, will share on the Dev mail list also.
>>
>> We are slowly setting this up to check all would work etc etc.
>>
>> We have set the “owner” account to the private pmc mail address as per Apache guidelines, it seems there might be some filter on the private mail list as it seems the verify email from twitter is not received.
>>
>> I have such asked for advice from the PMC.
>>
>> Incase anyone has done this for other Apache projects and have some advice how they handled this or get the verify email, it is welcome.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Mike
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 16:34, Michael André Pearce <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Twitter for a group account has a nice level of owner, admin and user, that means committers can login with their own accounts and no one need the master/owners password for day to day, the owner account just needed to reset bits if ever needed.
>>>
>>> Owner = private pmc email (once we’ve setup all, this is easy to transfer)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 16:19, Michael André Pearce <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I would set it up sort it out then finally transfer the owner to private mail list so pmc have control
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>
>>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 13:36, Timothy Bish <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Any official project social media account needs to be under control the project PMC, refer to
>>>>> https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/socialmedia
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/01/2017 09:22 AM, Christopher Shannon wrote:
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Clebert Suconic <[hidden email]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> No objection from my side.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Nov 1, 2017, 07:07, at 07:07, "Michael André Pearce" <
>>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I would like to create an apacheactivemq twitter account, to increase
>>>>>>>>> the presence there. Similar to other Apache projects have.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It is possible to make a group account so would propose in the account
>>>>>>>>> I would add all known committers tweet accounts to it, I believe all
>>>>>>>>> become admin on doing this to avoid one person being admin, (and simply
>>>>>>>>> if I miss you/don't know your tweet handle just msg to get added if
>>>>>>>>> committer)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The idea is we can tweet about releases, blogs, features and retweet of
>>>>>>>>> anything activemq.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Before doing this I want to check there is no strong objections, as
>>>>>>>>> noted many other apache projects already do this. If none I would look
>>>>>>>>> to setup end of the week.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>> Mike
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Clebert Suconic
>>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Tim Bish
>>>>> twitter: @tabish121
>>>>> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
>>>>>

--
Tim Bish
twitter: @tabish121
blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Twitter

MichaelAndrePearce
Agreed PMC ultimately will have overall control.

This is why the mail before about the “owner” account to be the PMC.


Sent from my iPhone

> On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:24, Timothy Bish <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> On 11/01/2017 06:13 PM, Michael André Pearce wrote:
>> Also a shout out for committers and pmc, if you want to be added as we set this up we will need your twitter handles (I have some peoples but not all)
>
> Ultimately the PMC needs to decide which committers would be given access as per the Apache social media policy.
>
>>
>> Cheers
>> Mike
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:11, Michael André Pearce <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>> I have sent a mail to the PMC. But in the interest of being open, will share on the Dev mail list also.
>>>
>>> We are slowly setting this up to check all would work etc etc.
>>>
>>> We have set the “owner” account to the private pmc mail address as per Apache guidelines, it seems there might be some filter on the private mail list as it seems the verify email from twitter is not received.
>>>
>>> I have such asked for advice from the PMC.
>>>
>>> Incase anyone has done this for other Apache projects and have some advice how they handled this or get the verify email, it is welcome.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Mike
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 16:34, Michael André Pearce <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Twitter for a group account has a nice level of owner, admin and user, that means committers can login with their own accounts and no one need the master/owners password for day to day, the owner account just needed to reset bits if ever needed.
>>>>
>>>> Owner = private pmc email (once we’ve setup all, this is easy to transfer)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>
>>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 16:19, Michael André Pearce <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, I would set it up sort it out then finally transfer the owner to private mail list so pmc have control
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 13:36, Timothy Bish <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any official project social media account needs to be under control the project PMC, refer to
>>>>>> https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/socialmedia
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 11/01/2017 09:22 AM, Christopher Shannon wrote:
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Clebert Suconic <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> No objection from my side.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Nov 1, 2017, 07:07, at 07:07, "Michael André Pearce" <
>>>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I would like to create an apacheactivemq twitter account, to increase
>>>>>>>>>> the presence there. Similar to other Apache projects have.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It is possible to make a group account so would propose in the account
>>>>>>>>>> I would add all known committers tweet accounts to it, I believe all
>>>>>>>>>> become admin on doing this to avoid one person being admin, (and simply
>>>>>>>>>> if I miss you/don't know your tweet handle just msg to get added if
>>>>>>>>>> committer)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The idea is we can tweet about releases, blogs, features and retweet of
>>>>>>>>>> anything activemq.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Before doing this I want to check there is no strong objections, as
>>>>>>>>>> noted many other apache projects already do this. If none I would look
>>>>>>>>>> to setup end of the week.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>>> Mike
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Clebert Suconic
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Tim Bish
>>>>>> twitter: @tabish121
>>>>>> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>
>
> --
> Tim Bish
> twitter: @tabish121
> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Twitter

tabish121@gmail.com
On 11/01/2017 06:40 PM, Michael André Pearce wrote:
> Agreed PMC ultimately will have overall control.
>
> This is why the mail before about the “owner” account to be the PMC.
>

Problem being that there is now a "official" ActiveMQ twitter account
that is not currently owned or controlled by the PMC that was created
from a discussion that did not give the standard 72 hours for discussion
and either consensus or lazy consensus to occur.

> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:24, Timothy Bish <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/01/2017 06:13 PM, Michael André Pearce wrote:
>>> Also a shout out for committers and pmc, if you want to be added as we set this up we will need your twitter handles (I have some peoples but not all)
>> Ultimately the PMC needs to decide which committers would be given access as per the Apache social media policy.
>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Mike
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:11, Michael André Pearce <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I have sent a mail to the PMC. But in the interest of being open, will share on the Dev mail list also.
>>>>
>>>> We are slowly setting this up to check all would work etc etc.
>>>>
>>>> We have set the “owner” account to the private pmc mail address as per Apache guidelines, it seems there might be some filter on the private mail list as it seems the verify email from twitter is not received.
>>>>
>>>> I have such asked for advice from the PMC.
>>>>
>>>> Incase anyone has done this for other Apache projects and have some advice how they handled this or get the verify email, it is welcome.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Mike
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>
>>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 16:34, Michael André Pearce <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Twitter for a group account has a nice level of owner, admin and user, that means committers can login with their own accounts and no one need the master/owners password for day to day, the owner account just needed to reset bits if ever needed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Owner = private pmc email (once we’ve setup all, this is easy to transfer)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 16:19, Michael André Pearce <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, I would set it up sort it out then finally transfer the owner to private mail list so pmc have control
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 13:36, Timothy Bish <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Any official project social media account needs to be under control the project PMC, refer to
>>>>>>> https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/socialmedia
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 11/01/2017 09:22 AM, Christopher Shannon wrote:
>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Clebert Suconic <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> No objection from my side.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 1, 2017, 07:07, at 07:07, "Michael André Pearce" <
>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I would like to create an apacheactivemq twitter account, to increase
>>>>>>>>>>> the presence there. Similar to other Apache projects have.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It is possible to make a group account so would propose in the account
>>>>>>>>>>> I would add all known committers tweet accounts to it, I believe all
>>>>>>>>>>> become admin on doing this to avoid one person being admin, (and simply
>>>>>>>>>>> if I miss you/don't know your tweet handle just msg to get added if
>>>>>>>>>>> committer)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The idea is we can tweet about releases, blogs, features and retweet of
>>>>>>>>>>> anything activemq.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Before doing this I want to check there is no strong objections, as
>>>>>>>>>>> noted many other apache projects already do this. If none I would look
>>>>>>>>>>> to setup end of the week.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>>>> Mike
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Clebert Suconic
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Tim Bish
>>>>>>> twitter: @tabish121
>>>>>>> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>
>> --
>> Tim Bish
>> twitter: @tabish121
>> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
>>

--
Tim Bish
twitter: @tabish121
blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Twitter

MichaelAndrePearce
That would be my apologies on that i was setting up to make sure it would work. I didn’t realise the ramifications I will disable it whilst we await the time to elapse.

Please accept my apologies



Sent from my iPhone

> On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:49, Timothy Bish <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> On 11/01/2017 06:40 PM, Michael André Pearce wrote:
>> Agreed PMC ultimately will have overall control.
>>
>> This is why the mail before about the “owner” account to be the PMC.
>>
>
> Problem being that there is now a "official" ActiveMQ twitter account that is not currently owned or controlled by the PMC that was created from a discussion that did not give the standard 72 hours for discussion and either consensus or lazy consensus to occur.
>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:24, Timothy Bish <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 11/01/2017 06:13 PM, Michael André Pearce wrote:
>>>> Also a shout out for committers and pmc, if you want to be added as we set this up we will need your twitter handles (I have some peoples but not all)
>>> Ultimately the PMC needs to decide which committers would be given access as per the Apache social media policy.
>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Mike
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>
>>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:11, Michael André Pearce <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I have sent a mail to the PMC. But in the interest of being open, will share on the Dev mail list also.
>>>>>
>>>>> We are slowly setting this up to check all would work etc etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> We have set the “owner” account to the private pmc mail address as per Apache guidelines, it seems there might be some filter on the private mail list as it seems the verify email from twitter is not received.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have such asked for advice from the PMC.
>>>>>
>>>>> Incase anyone has done this for other Apache projects and have some advice how they handled this or get the verify email, it is welcome.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> Mike
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 16:34, Michael André Pearce <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Twitter for a group account has a nice level of owner, admin and user, that means committers can login with their own accounts and no one need the master/owners password for day to day, the owner account just needed to reset bits if ever needed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Owner = private pmc email (once we’ve setup all, this is easy to transfer)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 16:19, Michael André Pearce <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, I would set it up sort it out then finally transfer the owner to private mail list so pmc have control
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 13:36, Timothy Bish <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Any official project social media account needs to be under control the project PMC, refer to
>>>>>>>> https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/socialmedia
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 11/01/2017 09:22 AM, Christopher Shannon wrote:
>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Clebert Suconic <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> No objection from my side.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 1, 2017, 07:07, at 07:07, "Michael André Pearce" <
>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I would like to create an apacheactivemq twitter account, to increase
>>>>>>>>>>>> the presence there. Similar to other Apache projects have.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It is possible to make a group account so would propose in the account
>>>>>>>>>>>> I would add all known committers tweet accounts to it, I believe all
>>>>>>>>>>>> become admin on doing this to avoid one person being admin, (and simply
>>>>>>>>>>>> if I miss you/don't know your tweet handle just msg to get added if
>>>>>>>>>>>> committer)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The idea is we can tweet about releases, blogs, features and retweet of
>>>>>>>>>>>> anything activemq.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Before doing this I want to check there is no strong objections, as
>>>>>>>>>>>> noted many other apache projects already do this. If none I would look
>>>>>>>>>>>> to setup end of the week.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>>>>> Mike
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Clebert Suconic
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Tim Bish
>>>>>>>> twitter: @tabish121
>>>>>>>> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>
>>> --
>>> Tim Bish
>>> twitter: @tabish121
>>> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
>>>
>
> --
> Tim Bish
> twitter: @tabish121
> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Twitter

MichaelAndrePearce
Should be deactivated now.



> On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:51, Michael André Pearce <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> That would be my apologies on that i was setting up to make sure it would work. I didn’t realise the ramifications I will disable it whilst we await the time to elapse.
>
> Please accept my apologies
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:49, Timothy Bish <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/01/2017 06:40 PM, Michael André Pearce wrote:
>>> Agreed PMC ultimately will have overall control.
>>>
>>> This is why the mail before about the “owner” account to be the PMC.
>>>
>>
>> Problem being that there is now a "official" ActiveMQ twitter account that is not currently owned or controlled by the PMC that was created from a discussion that did not give the standard 72 hours for discussion and either consensus or lazy consensus to occur.
>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:24, Timothy Bish <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/01/2017 06:13 PM, Michael André Pearce wrote:
>>>>> Also a shout out for committers and pmc, if you want to be added as we set this up we will need your twitter handles (I have some peoples but not all)
>>>> Ultimately the PMC needs to decide which committers would be given access as per the Apache social media policy.
>>>>
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> Mike
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:11, Michael André Pearce <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have sent a mail to the PMC. But in the interest of being open, will share on the Dev mail list also.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We are slowly setting this up to check all would work etc etc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We have set the “owner” account to the private pmc mail address as per Apache guidelines, it seems there might be some filter on the private mail list as it seems the verify email from twitter is not received.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have such asked for advice from the PMC.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Incase anyone has done this for other Apache projects and have some advice how they handled this or get the verify email, it is welcome.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>> Mike
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 16:34, Michael André Pearce <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Twitter for a group account has a nice level of owner, admin and user, that means committers can login with their own accounts and no one need the master/owners password for day to day, the owner account just needed to reset bits if ever needed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Owner = private pmc email (once we’ve setup all, this is easy to transfer)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 16:19, Michael André Pearce <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes, I would set it up sort it out then finally transfer the owner to private mail list so pmc have control
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 13:36, Timothy Bish <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Any official project social media account needs to be under control the project PMC, refer to
>>>>>>>>> https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/socialmedia
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 11/01/2017 09:22 AM, Christopher Shannon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Clebert Suconic <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> No objection from my side.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 1, 2017, 07:07, at 07:07, "Michael André Pearce" <
>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would like to create an apacheactivemq twitter account, to increase
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the presence there. Similar to other Apache projects have.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is possible to make a group account so would propose in the account
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would add all known committers tweet accounts to it, I believe all
>>>>>>>>>>>>> become admin on doing this to avoid one person being admin, (and simply
>>>>>>>>>>>>> if I miss you/don't know your tweet handle just msg to get added if
>>>>>>>>>>>>> committer)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The idea is we can tweet about releases, blogs, features and retweet of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything activemq.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Before doing this I want to check there is no strong objections, as
>>>>>>>>>>>>> noted many other apache projects already do this. If none I would look
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to setup end of the week.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mike
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Clebert Suconic
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Tim Bish
>>>>>>>>> twitter: @tabish121
>>>>>>>>> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Tim Bish
>>>> twitter: @tabish121
>>>> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
>>>>
>>
>> --
>> Tim Bish
>> twitter: @tabish121
>> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
>>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Twitter

clebertsuconic
Do we a vote even for that? It seemed a no brainer.

On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 6:56 PM Michael André Pearce <
[hidden email]> wrote:

> Should be deactivated now.
>
>
>
> > On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:51, Michael André Pearce <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > That would be my apologies on that i was setting up to make sure it
> would work. I didn’t realise the ramifications I will disable it whilst we
> await the time to elapse.
> >
> > Please accept my apologies
> >
> >
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> >>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:49, Timothy Bish <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 11/01/2017 06:40 PM, Michael André Pearce wrote:
> >>> Agreed PMC ultimately will have overall control.
> >>>
> >>> This is why the mail before about the “owner” account to be the PMC.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Problem being that there is now a "official" ActiveMQ twitter account
> that is not currently owned or controlled by the PMC that was created from
> a discussion that did not give the standard 72 hours for discussion and
> either consensus or lazy consensus to occur.
> >>
> >>> Sent from my iPhone
> >>>
> >>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:24, Timothy Bish <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 11/01/2017 06:13 PM, Michael André Pearce wrote:
> >>>>> Also a shout out for committers and pmc, if you want to be added as
> we set this up we will need your twitter handles (I have some peoples but
> not all)
> >>>> Ultimately the PMC needs to decide which committers would be given
> access as per the Apache social media policy.
> >>>>
> >>>>> Cheers
> >>>>> Mike
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Sent from my iPhone
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:11, Michael André Pearce <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I have sent a mail to the PMC. But in the interest of being open,
> will share on the Dev mail list also.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> We are slowly setting this up to check all would work etc etc.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> We have set the “owner” account to the private pmc mail address as
> per Apache guidelines, it seems there might be some filter on the private
> mail list as it seems the verify email from twitter is not received.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I have such asked for advice from the PMC.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Incase anyone has done this for other Apache projects and have some
> advice how they handled this or get the verify email, it is welcome.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Cheers
> >>>>>> Mike
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 16:34, Michael André Pearce <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Twitter for a group account has a nice level of owner, admin and
> user, that means committers can login with their own accounts and no one
> need the master/owners password for day to day, the owner account just
> needed to reset bits if ever needed.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Owner = private pmc email (once we’ve setup all, this is easy to
> transfer)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 16:19, Michael André Pearce <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Yes, I would set it up sort it out then finally transfer the
> owner to private mail list so pmc have control
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 13:36, Timothy Bish <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Any official project social media account needs to be under
> control the project PMC, refer to
> >>>>>>>>> https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/socialmedia
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 11/01/2017 09:22 AM, Christopher Shannon wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> +1
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Clebert Suconic <
> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> +1
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> No objection from my side.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>>>>>>>> JB
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 1, 2017, 07:07, at 07:07, "Michael André Pearce" <
> >>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I would like to create an apacheactivemq twitter account, to
> increase
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the presence there. Similar to other Apache projects have.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> It is possible to make a group account so would propose in
> the account
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I would add all known committers tweet accounts to it, I
> believe all
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> become admin on doing this to avoid one person being admin,
> (and simply
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> if I miss you/don't know your tweet handle just msg to get
> added if
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> committer)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The idea is we can tweet about releases, blogs, features and
> retweet of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> anything activemq.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Before doing this I want to check there is no strong
> objections, as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> noted many other apache projects already do this. If none I
> would look
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> to setup end of the week.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Mike
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPad
> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>> Clebert Suconic
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>> Tim Bish
> >>>>>>>>> twitter: @tabish121
> >>>>>>>>> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Tim Bish
> >>>> twitter: @tabish121
> >>>> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
> >>>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Tim Bish
> >> twitter: @tabish121
> >> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
> >>
>
--
Clebert Suconic
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Twitter

christopher.l.shannon
I think lazy concensus is ok.  As long as no one has any objections I would
think it's ok to move ahead with it under PMC control as Tim pointed out.
But Tim is right that should give it 72 hours for people to see the thread
and comment.

On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 7:28 PM, Clebert Suconic <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Do we a vote even for that? It seemed a no brainer.
>
> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 6:56 PM Michael André Pearce <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > Should be deactivated now.
> >
> >
> >
> > > On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:51, Michael André Pearce <
> > [hidden email]> wrote:
> > >
> > > That would be my apologies on that i was setting up to make sure it
> > would work. I didn’t realise the ramifications I will disable it whilst
> we
> > await the time to elapse.
> > >
> > > Please accept my apologies
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Sent from my iPhone
> > >
> > >>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:49, Timothy Bish <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> On 11/01/2017 06:40 PM, Michael André Pearce wrote:
> > >>> Agreed PMC ultimately will have overall control.
> > >>>
> > >>> This is why the mail before about the “owner” account to be the PMC.
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> Problem being that there is now a "official" ActiveMQ twitter account
> > that is not currently owned or controlled by the PMC that was created
> from
> > a discussion that did not give the standard 72 hours for discussion and
> > either consensus or lazy consensus to occur.
> > >>
> > >>> Sent from my iPhone
> > >>>
> > >>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:24, Timothy Bish <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On 11/01/2017 06:13 PM, Michael André Pearce wrote:
> > >>>>> Also a shout out for committers and pmc, if you want to be added as
> > we set this up we will need your twitter handles (I have some peoples but
> > not all)
> > >>>> Ultimately the PMC needs to decide which committers would be given
> > access as per the Apache social media policy.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Cheers
> > >>>>> Mike
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Sent from my iPhone
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:11, Michael André Pearce <
> > [hidden email]> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I have sent a mail to the PMC. But in the interest of being open,
> > will share on the Dev mail list also.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> We are slowly setting this up to check all would work etc etc.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> We have set the “owner” account to the private pmc mail address as
> > per Apache guidelines, it seems there might be some filter on the private
> > mail list as it seems the verify email from twitter is not received.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I have such asked for advice from the PMC.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Incase anyone has done this for other Apache projects and have
> some
> > advice how they handled this or get the verify email, it is welcome.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Cheers
> > >>>>>> Mike
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 16:34, Michael André Pearce <
> > [hidden email]> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Twitter for a group account has a nice level of owner, admin and
> > user, that means committers can login with their own accounts and no one
> > need the master/owners password for day to day, the owner account just
> > needed to reset bits if ever needed.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Owner = private pmc email (once we’ve setup all, this is easy to
> > transfer)
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 16:19, Michael André Pearce <
> > [hidden email]> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Yes, I would set it up sort it out then finally transfer the
> > owner to private mail list so pmc have control
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 13:36, Timothy Bish <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Any official project social media account needs to be under
> > control the project PMC, refer to
> > >>>>>>>>> https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/socialmedia
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On 11/01/2017 09:22 AM, Christopher Shannon wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>> +1
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Clebert Suconic <
> > [hidden email]>
> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> +1
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
> > [hidden email]>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> No objection from my side.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> JB
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 1, 2017, 07:07, at 07:07, "Michael André Pearce" <
> > >>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I would like to create an apacheactivemq twitter account,
> to
> > increase
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the presence there. Similar to other Apache projects have.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> It is possible to make a group account so would propose in
> > the account
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I would add all known committers tweet accounts to it, I
> > believe all
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> become admin on doing this to avoid one person being admin,
> > (and simply
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> if I miss you/don't know your tweet handle just msg to get
> > added if
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> committer)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> The idea is we can tweet about releases, blogs, features
> and
> > retweet of
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> anything activemq.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Before doing this I want to check there is no strong
> > objections, as
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> noted many other apache projects already do this. If none I
> > would look
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> to setup end of the week.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Mike
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPad
> > >>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Clebert Suconic
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>> Tim Bish
> > >>>>>>>>> twitter: @tabish121
> > >>>>>>>>> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> Tim Bish
> > >>>> twitter: @tabish121
> > >>>> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
> > >>>>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Tim Bish
> > >> twitter: @tabish121
> > >> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
> > >>
> >
> --
> Clebert Suconic
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Twitter

Martyn Taylor
+1 from me

On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 12:43 AM, Christopher Shannon <
[hidden email]> wrote:

> I think lazy concensus is ok.  As long as no one has any objections I would
> think it's ok to move ahead with it under PMC control as Tim pointed out.
> But Tim is right that should give it 72 hours for people to see the thread
> and comment.
>
> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 7:28 PM, Clebert Suconic <[hidden email]
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Do we a vote even for that? It seemed a no brainer.
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 6:56 PM Michael André Pearce <
> > [hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > > Should be deactivated now.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:51, Michael André Pearce <
> > > [hidden email]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > That would be my apologies on that i was setting up to make sure it
> > > would work. I didn’t realise the ramifications I will disable it whilst
> > we
> > > await the time to elapse.
> > > >
> > > > Please accept my apologies
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Sent from my iPhone
> > > >
> > > >>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:49, Timothy Bish <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On 11/01/2017 06:40 PM, Michael André Pearce wrote:
> > > >>> Agreed PMC ultimately will have overall control.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> This is why the mail before about the “owner” account to be the
> PMC.
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >> Problem being that there is now a "official" ActiveMQ twitter
> account
> > > that is not currently owned or controlled by the PMC that was created
> > from
> > > a discussion that did not give the standard 72 hours for discussion and
> > > either consensus or lazy consensus to occur.
> > > >>
> > > >>> Sent from my iPhone
> > > >>>
> > > >>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:24, Timothy Bish <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On 11/01/2017 06:13 PM, Michael André Pearce wrote:
> > > >>>>> Also a shout out for committers and pmc, if you want to be added
> as
> > > we set this up we will need your twitter handles (I have some peoples
> but
> > > not all)
> > > >>>> Ultimately the PMC needs to decide which committers would be given
> > > access as per the Apache social media policy.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> Cheers
> > > >>>>> Mike
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Sent from my iPhone
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:11, Michael André Pearce <
> > > [hidden email]> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> I have sent a mail to the PMC. But in the interest of being
> open,
> > > will share on the Dev mail list also.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> We are slowly setting this up to check all would work etc etc.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> We have set the “owner” account to the private pmc mail address
> as
> > > per Apache guidelines, it seems there might be some filter on the
> private
> > > mail list as it seems the verify email from twitter is not received.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> I have such asked for advice from the PMC.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Incase anyone has done this for other Apache projects and have
> > some
> > > advice how they handled this or get the verify email, it is welcome.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Cheers
> > > >>>>>> Mike
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 16:34, Michael André Pearce <
> > > [hidden email]> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Twitter for a group account has a nice level of owner, admin
> and
> > > user, that means committers can login with their own accounts and no
> one
> > > need the master/owners password for day to day, the owner account just
> > > needed to reset bits if ever needed.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Owner = private pmc email (once we’ve setup all, this is easy
> to
> > > transfer)
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 16:19, Michael André Pearce <
> > > [hidden email]> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Yes, I would set it up sort it out then finally transfer the
> > > owner to private mail list so pmc have control
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 13:36, Timothy Bish <[hidden email]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Any official project social media account needs to be under
> > > control the project PMC, refer to
> > > >>>>>>>>> https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/socialmedia
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> On 11/01/2017 09:22 AM, Christopher Shannon wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>> +1
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Clebert Suconic <
> > > [hidden email]>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> +1
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
> > > [hidden email]>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> No objection from my side.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> JB
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 1, 2017, 07:07, at 07:07, "Michael André Pearce" <
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I would like to create an apacheactivemq twitter account,
> > to
> > > increase
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the presence there. Similar to other Apache projects
> have.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> It is possible to make a group account so would propose
> in
> > > the account
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I would add all known committers tweet accounts to it, I
> > > believe all
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> become admin on doing this to avoid one person being
> admin,
> > > (and simply
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> if I miss you/don't know your tweet handle just msg to
> get
> > > added if
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> committer)
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> The idea is we can tweet about releases, blogs, features
> > and
> > > retweet of
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> anything activemq.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Before doing this I want to check there is no strong
> > > objections, as
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> noted many other apache projects already do this. If
> none I
> > > would look
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> to setup end of the week.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Mike
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPad
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> --
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Clebert Suconic
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> --
> > > >>>>>>>>> Tim Bish
> > > >>>>>>>>> twitter: @tabish121
> > > >>>>>>>>> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>> --
> > > >>>> Tim Bish
> > > >>>> twitter: @tabish121
> > > >>>> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
> > > >>>>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> Tim Bish
> > > >> twitter: @tabish121
> > > >> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
> > > >>
> > >
> > --
> > Clebert Suconic
> >
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Twitter

clebertsuconic
so, do we have consensus now? can we reactivate it?

On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 9:29 AM, Martyn Taylor <[hidden email]> wrote:

> +1 from me
>
> On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 12:43 AM, Christopher Shannon <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> I think lazy concensus is ok.  As long as no one has any objections I would
>> think it's ok to move ahead with it under PMC control as Tim pointed out.
>> But Tim is right that should give it 72 hours for people to see the thread
>> and comment.
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 7:28 PM, Clebert Suconic <[hidden email]
>> >
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Do we a vote even for that? It seemed a no brainer.
>> >
>> > On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 6:56 PM Michael André Pearce <
>> > [hidden email]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Should be deactivated now.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > > On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:51, Michael André Pearce <
>> > > [hidden email]> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > That would be my apologies on that i was setting up to make sure it
>> > > would work. I didn’t realise the ramifications I will disable it whilst
>> > we
>> > > await the time to elapse.
>> > > >
>> > > > Please accept my apologies
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Sent from my iPhone
>> > > >
>> > > >>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:49, Timothy Bish <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> On 11/01/2017 06:40 PM, Michael André Pearce wrote:
>> > > >>> Agreed PMC ultimately will have overall control.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> This is why the mail before about the “owner” account to be the
>> PMC.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Problem being that there is now a "official" ActiveMQ twitter
>> account
>> > > that is not currently owned or controlled by the PMC that was created
>> > from
>> > > a discussion that did not give the standard 72 hours for discussion and
>> > > either consensus or lazy consensus to occur.
>> > > >>
>> > > >>> Sent from my iPhone
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:24, Timothy Bish <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>> On 11/01/2017 06:13 PM, Michael André Pearce wrote:
>> > > >>>>> Also a shout out for committers and pmc, if you want to be added
>> as
>> > > we set this up we will need your twitter handles (I have some peoples
>> but
>> > > not all)
>> > > >>>> Ultimately the PMC needs to decide which committers would be given
>> > > access as per the Apache social media policy.
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>>> Cheers
>> > > >>>>> Mike
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:11, Michael André Pearce <
>> > > [hidden email]> wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>> I have sent a mail to the PMC. But in the interest of being
>> open,
>> > > will share on the Dev mail list also.
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>> We are slowly setting this up to check all would work etc etc.
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>> We have set the “owner” account to the private pmc mail address
>> as
>> > > per Apache guidelines, it seems there might be some filter on the
>> private
>> > > mail list as it seems the verify email from twitter is not received.
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>> I have such asked for advice from the PMC.
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>> Incase anyone has done this for other Apache projects and have
>> > some
>> > > advice how they handled this or get the verify email, it is welcome.
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>> Cheers
>> > > >>>>>> Mike
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 16:34, Michael André Pearce <
>> > > [hidden email]> wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> Twitter for a group account has a nice level of owner, admin
>> and
>> > > user, that means committers can login with their own accounts and no
>> one
>> > > need the master/owners password for day to day, the owner account just
>> > > needed to reset bits if ever needed.
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> Owner = private pmc email (once we’ve setup all, this is easy
>> to
>> > > transfer)
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 16:19, Michael André Pearce <
>> > > [hidden email]> wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>> Yes, I would set it up sort it out then finally transfer the
>> > > owner to private mail list so pmc have control
>> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 13:36, Timothy Bish <[hidden email]>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>> Any official project social media account needs to be under
>> > > control the project PMC, refer to
>> > > >>>>>>>>> https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/socialmedia
>> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> On 11/01/2017 09:22 AM, Christopher Shannon wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> +1
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Clebert Suconic <
>> > > [hidden email]>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> +1
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
>> > > [hidden email]>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> No objection from my side.
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> JB
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 1, 2017, 07:07, at 07:07, "Michael André Pearce" <
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I would like to create an apacheactivemq twitter account,
>> > to
>> > > increase
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the presence there. Similar to other Apache projects
>> have.
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> It is possible to make a group account so would propose
>> in
>> > > the account
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I would add all known committers tweet accounts to it, I
>> > > believe all
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> become admin on doing this to avoid one person being
>> admin,
>> > > (and simply
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> if I miss you/don't know your tweet handle just msg to
>> get
>> > > added if
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> committer)
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> The idea is we can tweet about releases, blogs, features
>> > and
>> > > retweet of
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> anything activemq.
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Before doing this I want to check there is no strong
>> > > objections, as
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> noted many other apache projects already do this. If
>> none I
>> > > would look
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> to setup end of the week.
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Mike
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> --
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Clebert Suconic
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>> --
>> > > >>>>>>>>> Tim Bish
>> > > >>>>>>>>> twitter: @tabish121
>> > > >>>>>>>>> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
>> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>> --
>> > > >>>> Tim Bish
>> > > >>>> twitter: @tabish121
>> > > >>>> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> --
>> > > >> Tim Bish
>> > > >> twitter: @tabish121
>> > > >> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> > --
>> > Clebert Suconic
>> >
>>



--
Clebert Suconic
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Twitter

MichaelAndrePearce
I believe we have now passed both getting 3x +1 pmc votes and 72hours have passed. I’ll re-activate with just pmc added to it as admins

Sent from my iPhone

> On 6 Nov 2017, at 15:24, Clebert Suconic <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> so, do we have consensus now? can we reactivate it?
>
>> On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 9:29 AM, Martyn Taylor <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> +1 from me
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 12:43 AM, Christopher Shannon <
>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> I think lazy concensus is ok.  As long as no one has any objections I would
>>> think it's ok to move ahead with it under PMC control as Tim pointed out.
>>> But Tim is right that should give it 72 hours for people to see the thread
>>> and comment.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 7:28 PM, Clebert Suconic <[hidden email]
>>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Do we a vote even for that? It seemed a no brainer.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 6:56 PM Michael André Pearce <
>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Should be deactivated now.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:51, Michael André Pearce <
>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That would be my apologies on that i was setting up to make sure it
>>>>> would work. I didn’t realise the ramifications I will disable it whilst
>>>> we
>>>>> await the time to elapse.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please accept my apologies
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:49, Timothy Bish <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 11/01/2017 06:40 PM, Michael André Pearce wrote:
>>>>>>>> Agreed PMC ultimately will have overall control.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is why the mail before about the “owner” account to be the
>>> PMC.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Problem being that there is now a "official" ActiveMQ twitter
>>> account
>>>>> that is not currently owned or controlled by the PMC that was created
>>>> from
>>>>> a discussion that did not give the standard 72 hours for discussion and
>>>>> either consensus or lazy consensus to occur.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:24, Timothy Bish <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 11/01/2017 06:13 PM, Michael André Pearce wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Also a shout out for committers and pmc, if you want to be added
>>> as
>>>>> we set this up we will need your twitter handles (I have some peoples
>>> but
>>>>> not all)
>>>>>>>>> Ultimately the PMC needs to decide which committers would be given
>>>>> access as per the Apache social media policy.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>>> Mike
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:11, Michael André Pearce <
>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I have sent a mail to the PMC. But in the interest of being
>>> open,
>>>>> will share on the Dev mail list also.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> We are slowly setting this up to check all would work etc etc.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> We have set the “owner” account to the private pmc mail address
>>> as
>>>>> per Apache guidelines, it seems there might be some filter on the
>>> private
>>>>> mail list as it seems the verify email from twitter is not received.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I have such asked for advice from the PMC.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Incase anyone has done this for other Apache projects and have
>>>> some
>>>>> advice how they handled this or get the verify email, it is welcome.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>>>> Mike
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 16:34, Michael André Pearce <
>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Twitter for a group account has a nice level of owner, admin
>>> and
>>>>> user, that means committers can login with their own accounts and no
>>> one
>>>>> need the master/owners password for day to day, the owner account just
>>>>> needed to reset bits if ever needed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Owner = private pmc email (once we’ve setup all, this is easy
>>> to
>>>>> transfer)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 16:19, Michael André Pearce <
>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, I would set it up sort it out then finally transfer the
>>>>> owner to private mail list so pmc have control
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 13:36, Timothy Bish <[hidden email]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any official project social media account needs to be under
>>>>> control the project PMC, refer to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/socialmedia
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/01/2017 09:22 AM, Christopher Shannon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Clebert Suconic <
>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No objection from my side.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 1, 2017, 07:07, at 07:07, "Michael André Pearce" <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would like to create an apacheactivemq twitter account,
>>>> to
>>>>> increase
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the presence there. Similar to other Apache projects
>>> have.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is possible to make a group account so would propose
>>> in
>>>>> the account
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would add all known committers tweet accounts to it, I
>>>>> believe all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> become admin on doing this to avoid one person being
>>> admin,
>>>>> (and simply
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if I miss you/don't know your tweet handle just msg to
>>> get
>>>>> added if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> committer)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The idea is we can tweet about releases, blogs, features
>>>> and
>>>>> retweet of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything activemq.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Before doing this I want to check there is no strong
>>>>> objections, as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> noted many other apache projects already do this. If
>>> none I
>>>>> would look
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to setup end of the week.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mike
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Clebert Suconic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tim Bish
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> twitter: @tabish121
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Tim Bish
>>>>>>>>> twitter: @tabish121
>>>>>>>>> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Tim Bish
>>>>>>> twitter: @tabish121
>>>>>>> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Clebert Suconic
>>>>
>>>
>
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic