SVN still in use?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

SVN still in use?

Bruce Snyder
It has come to my attention that Subversion is still being used for
ActiveMQ project releases. Most projects have migrated to using
https://dist.apache.org.org/repos/dist for uploading releases, and, in
fact, the ASF Infra team confirmed that this is the new standard. Is it
possible to move our release processes toward the use of Git releases so
that we can completely forgo the use of Subversion?

Bruce
--
perl -e 'print
unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'

Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: SVN still in use?

Bruce Snyder
Any thoughts on changing the release process for each project to get away
from using Subversion and migrate to the use of
https://dist.apache.org.org/repos/dist ?

Bruce

On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 11:59 AM Bruce Snyder <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> It has come to my attention that Subversion is still being used for
> ActiveMQ project releases. Most projects have migrated to using
> https://dist.apache.org.org/repos/dist for uploading releases, and, in
> fact, the ASF Infra team confirmed that this is the new standard. Is it
> possible to move our release processes toward the use of Git releases so
> that we can completely forgo the use of Subversion?
>
> Bruce
> --
> perl -e 'print
> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
>
> Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
>


--
perl -e 'print
unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'

Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: SVN still in use?

jbonofre
Hi Bruce,

When I did ActiveMQ 5.15.x releases, I didn’t use svn but dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org/>.

What part of the release process use svn ?

Regards
JB

> Le 30 mars 2020 à 22:13, Bruce Snyder <[hidden email]> a écrit :
>
> Any thoughts on changing the release process for each project to get away
> from using Subversion and migrate to the use of
> https://dist.apache.org.org/repos/dist ?
>
> Bruce
>
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 11:59 AM Bruce Snyder <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>> It has come to my attention that Subversion is still being used for
>> ActiveMQ project releases. Most projects have migrated to using
>> https://dist.apache.org.org/repos/dist for uploading releases, and, in
>> fact, the ASF Infra team confirmed that this is the new standard. Is it
>> possible to move our release processes toward the use of Git releases so
>> that we can completely forgo the use of Subversion?
>>
>> Bruce
>> --
>> perl -e 'print
>> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
>>
>> Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
>>
>
>
> --
> perl -e 'print
> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
>
> Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: SVN still in use?

Robbie Gemmell
The https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/ repo is already being used for
distributing releases and has been for some time. It still appears to
be the infra / foundation documented route for publishing releases.

However https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/ is itself a Subversion
repo, is that causing some confusion here? If not, what am I missing?

I believe all the components use a git repo for their sources:
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf#activemq

Robbie

On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 06:54, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <[hidden email]> wrote:

>
> Hi Bruce,
>
> When I did ActiveMQ 5.15.x releases, I didn’t use svn but dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org/>.
>
> What part of the release process use svn ?
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> > Le 30 mars 2020 à 22:13, Bruce Snyder <[hidden email]> a écrit :
> >
> > Any thoughts on changing the release process for each project to get away
> > from using Subversion and migrate to the use of
> > https://dist.apache.org.org/repos/dist ?
> >
> > Bruce
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 11:59 AM Bruce Snyder <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> It has come to my attention that Subversion is still being used for
> >> ActiveMQ project releases. Most projects have migrated to using
> >> https://dist.apache.org.org/repos/dist for uploading releases, and, in
> >> fact, the ASF Infra team confirmed that this is the new standard. Is it
> >> possible to move our release processes toward the use of Git releases so
> >> that we can completely forgo the use of Subversion?
> >>
> >> Bruce
> >> --
> >> perl -e 'print
> >> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
> >>
> >> Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
> >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > perl -e 'print
> > unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
> >
> > Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
> > Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: SVN still in use?

Bruce Snyder
Ok, then it sounds like we are actually using
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/ for releases.

Thank you for confirming.

Bruce

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 5:39 AM Robbie Gemmell <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> The https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/ repo is already being used for
> distributing releases and has been for some time. It still appears to
> be the infra / foundation documented route for publishing releases.
>
> However https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/ is itself a Subversion
> repo, is that causing some confusion here? If not, what am I missing?
>
> I believe all the components use a git repo for their sources:
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf#activemq
>
> Robbie
>
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 06:54, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Bruce,
> >
> > When I did ActiveMQ 5.15.x releases, I didn’t use svn but
> dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org/>.
> >
> > What part of the release process use svn ?
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> > > Le 30 mars 2020 à 22:13, Bruce Snyder <[hidden email]> a
> écrit :
> > >
> > > Any thoughts on changing the release process for each project to get
> away
> > > from using Subversion and migrate to the use of
> > > https://dist.apache.org.org/repos/dist ?
> > >
> > > Bruce
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 11:59 AM Bruce Snyder <[hidden email]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> It has come to my attention that Subversion is still being used for
> > >> ActiveMQ project releases. Most projects have migrated to using
> > >> https://dist.apache.org.org/repos/dist for uploading releases, and,
> in
> > >> fact, the ASF Infra team confirmed that this is the new standard. Is
> it
> > >> possible to move our release processes toward the use of Git releases
> so
> > >> that we can completely forgo the use of Subversion?
> > >>
> > >> Bruce
> > >> --
> > >> perl -e 'print
> > >> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
> );'
> > >>
> > >> Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
> > >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > perl -e 'print
> > > unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
> );'
> > >
> > > Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
> > > Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
> >
>


--
perl -e 'print
unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'

Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder