Naming Suggestions?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
53 messages Options
123
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Naming Suggestions?

Robbie Gemmell
Battlestar. Basestar. There are probably more A's and C's that I can
think of right now than B's.

Steering clear of the Cylon models.. :)

Robbie

On 10 April 2015 at 17:51, James Carman <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Yes a BSG fan!  Baltar would work
>
> On Friday, April 10, 2015, Andy Taylor <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Or Baltar ;)
>> On 10 Apr 2015 17:41, "James Carman" <[hidden email]
>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>
>> > Bertha, I like that.  If we are using an alphabetic progression, then
>> that
>> > could come after Apollo. :)
>> >
>> > On Friday, April 10, 2015, Justin Bertram <[hidden email]
>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Any of those in favor of "Reactive"...In the event that this name is
>> > > actually chosen, do you have a simple definition of what "reactive"
>> means
>> > > in this context so it can explained to those who don't know?
>> > >
>> > > I don't particularly care what it's code-named.  You could call it
>> > > "Bertha" if you like.  I don't think it matters much at the end of the
>> > day.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Justin
>> > >
>> > > ----- Original Message -----
>> > > From: "Christian Posta" <[hidden email] <javascript:;>
>> <javascript:;>>
>> > > To: [hidden email] <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
>> > > Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 11:16:58 AM
>> > > Subject: Re: Naming Suggestions?
>> > >
>> > > I like that! REActiveMQ
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Dejan Bosanac <[hidden email]
>> <javascript:;>
>> > > <javascript:;>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > I like Reactive, as it also gives nice options for logo and other
>> > visual
>> > > > stuff, like (RE)ActiveMQ
>> > > >
>> > > > Regards
>> > > > --
>> > > > Dejan Bosanac
>> > > > ----------------------
>> > > > Red Hat, Inc.
>> > > > [hidden email] <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
>> > > > Twitter: @dejanb
>> > > > Blog: http://sensatic.net
>> > > > ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>> > > >
>> > > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Clebert Suconic <
>> > > > [hidden email] <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > >  I am.. but I thought about the coffee  :)
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:12 AM, James Carman
>> > > > > <[hidden email] <javascript:;> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>> > > > > > No Battlestar Galactica fans?
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Friday, April 10, 2015, James Carman <
>> > [hidden email] <javascript:;>
>> > > <javascript:;>>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >> How about Starbuck?
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> On Friday, April 10, 2015, Gary Tully <[hidden email]
>> <javascript:;>
>> > > <javascript:;>
>> > > > > >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[hidden email]
>> <javascript:;>
>> > <javascript:;>');>>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >>> I am with you Martyn, something very easy to spell and
>> pronounce
>> > > > would
>> > > > > >>> be my preference too :-)
>> > > > > >>> Luna hits the mark.
>> > > > > >>>
>> > > > > >>> On 10 April 2015 at 10:37, Martyn Taylor <[hidden email]
>> <javascript:;>
>> > > <javascript:;>> wrote:
>> > > > > >>> > After being stung in the past working on the "Aeolus"
>> project.
>> > > I'd
>> > > > > >>> prefer
>> > > > > >>> > to have a name that is super easy to spell and pronounce.
>> > Artemis
>> > > > is
>> > > > > >>> pushing
>> > > > > >>> > it a little for me.
>> > > > > >>> >
>> > > > > >>> > How about something really simple, like "Luna", Roman moon
>> > > goddess.
>> > > > > >>> >
>> > > > > >>> >
>> > > > > >>> > On 09/04/15 14:18, James Carman wrote:
>> > > > > >>> >>
>> > > > > >>> >> It is a good name.  Do we need to engage trademarks@ for
>> code
>> > > > > names?
>> > > > > >>> >>
>> > > > > >>> >> On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Hiram Chirino <
>> > > [hidden email] <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
>> > > > >
>> > > > > >>> wrote:
>> > > > > >>> >>
>> > > > > >>> >>> I do like Artemis.  ActiveMQ Artemis has a nice ring to it.
>> > > > > >>> >>>
>> > > > > >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Christian Posta
>> > > > > >>> >>> <[hidden email] <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
>> <javascript:;>>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > > >>> >>>>
>> > > > > >>> >>>> Nice, Dan! ArtemisMQ! I like it.
>> > > > > >>> >>>>
>> > > > > >>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Daniel Kulp <
>> > [hidden email] <javascript:;>
>> > > <javascript:;>
>> > > > > >>> >>>
>> > > > > >>> >>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>> > > > > >>> >>>>>>
>> > > > > >>> >>>>>> On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <
>> > > > > [hidden email] <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
>> > > > > >>> >>>
>> > > > > >>> >>> <javascript:;>>
>> > > > > >>> >>>>>
>> > > > > >>> >>>>> wrote:
>> > > > > >>> >>>>>>
>> > > > > >>> >>>>>> Naming things is hard.  If we gave the hornetq code
>> grant
>> > a
>> > > > code
>> > > > > >>> name
>> > > > > >>> >>>>>> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be
>> > avoid
>> > > > lots
>> > > > > >>> of TM
>> > > > > >>> >>>>>> confusion.  Anybody have any suggestion what would be a
>> > good
>> > > > > name
>> > > > > >>> to
>> > > > > >>> >>>>>> give it?
>> > > > > >>> >>>>>
>> > > > > >>> >>>>> Hermes?    That would be Apollo’s half brother.
>> > > > > >>> >>>>>
>> > > > > >>> >>>>> Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
>> > > > > >>> >>>>>
>> > > > > >>> >>>>>
>> > > > > >>> >>>>> Dan
>> > > > > >>> >>>>>
>> > > > > >>> >>>>>
>> > > > > >>> >>>>>
>> > > > > >>> >>>>>> --
>> > > > > >>> >>>>>> Hiram Chirino
>> > > > > >>> >>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>> > > > > >>> >>>>>> [hidden email] <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
>> <javascript:;> |
>> > > fusesource.com |
>> > > > > redhat.com
>> > > > > >>> >>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>> > > > > >>> >>>>>
>> > > > > >>> >>>>> --
>> > > > > >>> >>>>> Daniel Kulp
>> > > > > >>> >>>>> [hidden email] <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
>> <javascript:;> -
>> > > http://dankulp.com/blog
>> > > > > >>> >>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>> > > > > >>> >>>>>
>> > > > > >>> >>>>>
>> > > > > >>> >>>>
>> > > > > >>> >>>> --
>> > > > > >>> >>>> *Christian Posta*
>> > > > > >>> >>>> twitter: @christianposta
>> > > > > >>> >>>> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
>> > > > > >>> >>>> http://fabric8.io
>> > > > > >>> >>>
>> > > > > >>> >>>
>> > > > > >>> >>>
>> > > > > >>> >>> --
>> > > > > >>> >>> Hiram Chirino
>> > > > > >>> >>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>> > > > > >>> >>> [hidden email] <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
>> <javascript:;> |
>> > > fusesource.com | redhat.com
>> > > > > >>> >>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>> > > > > >>> >>>
>> > > > > >>> >
>> > > > > >>>
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > --
>> > > > > Clebert Suconic
>> > > > > http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@...
>> > > > > http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > *Christian Posta*
>> > > twitter: @christianposta
>> > > http://www.christianposta.com/blog
>> > > http://fabric8.io
>> > >
>> >
>>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Naming Suggestions?

ceposta
In reply to this post by Justin Bertram-2
I like jstrachan's definition: "based on a different, reactive/netty broker
kernel"

On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Justin Bertram <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Any of those in favor of "Reactive"...In the event that this name is
> actually chosen, do you have a simple definition of what "reactive" means
> in this context so it can explained to those who don't know?
>
> I don't particularly care what it's code-named.  You could call it
> "Bertha" if you like.  I don't think it matters much at the end of the day.
>
>
> Justin
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Christian Posta" <[hidden email]>
> To: [hidden email]
> Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 11:16:58 AM
> Subject: Re: Naming Suggestions?
>
> I like that! REActiveMQ
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Dejan Bosanac <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > I like Reactive, as it also gives nice options for logo and other visual
> > stuff, like (RE)ActiveMQ
> >
> > Regards
> > --
> > Dejan Bosanac
> > ----------------------
> > Red Hat, Inc.
> > [hidden email]
> > Twitter: @dejanb
> > Blog: http://sensatic.net
> > ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Clebert Suconic <
> > [hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >  I am.. but I thought about the coffee  :)
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:12 AM, James Carman
> > > <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > No Battlestar Galactica fans?
> > > >
> > > > On Friday, April 10, 2015, James Carman <[hidden email]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> How about Starbuck?
> > > >>
> > > >> On Friday, April 10, 2015, Gary Tully <[hidden email]
> > > >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[hidden email]');>> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> I am with you Martyn, something very easy to spell and pronounce
> > would
> > > >>> be my preference too :-)
> > > >>> Luna hits the mark.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On 10 April 2015 at 10:37, Martyn Taylor <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > > >>> > After being stung in the past working on the "Aeolus" project.
> I'd
> > > >>> prefer
> > > >>> > to have a name that is super easy to spell and pronounce. Artemis
> > is
> > > >>> pushing
> > > >>> > it a little for me.
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > How about something really simple, like "Luna", Roman moon
> goddess.
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > On 09/04/15 14:18, James Carman wrote:
> > > >>> >>
> > > >>> >> It is a good name.  Do we need to engage trademarks@ for code
> > > names?
> > > >>> >>
> > > >>> >> On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Hiram Chirino <
> [hidden email]
> > >
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>> >>
> > > >>> >>> I do like Artemis.  ActiveMQ Artemis has a nice ring to it.
> > > >>> >>>
> > > >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Christian Posta
> > > >>> >>> <[hidden email] <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > >>> >>>>
> > > >>> >>>> Nice, Dan! ArtemisMQ! I like it.
> > > >>> >>>>
> > > >>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Daniel Kulp <[hidden email]
> > > >>> >>>
> > > >>> >>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > >>> >>>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>>> On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <
> > > [hidden email]
> > > >>> >>>
> > > >>> >>> <javascript:;>>
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>> wrote:
> > > >>> >>>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>>> Naming things is hard.  If we gave the hornetq code grant a
> > code
> > > >>> name
> > > >>> >>>>>> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid
> > lots
> > > >>> of TM
> > > >>> >>>>>> confusion.  Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good
> > > name
> > > >>> to
> > > >>> >>>>>> give it?
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>> Hermes?    That would be Apollo’s half brother.
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>> Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>> Dan
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>>> --
> > > >>> >>>>>> Hiram Chirino
> > > >>> >>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> > > >>> >>>>>> [hidden email] <javascript:;> | fusesource.com |
> > > redhat.com
> > > >>> >>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>> --
> > > >>> >>>>> Daniel Kulp
> > > >>> >>>>> [hidden email] <javascript:;> - http://dankulp.com/blog
> > > >>> >>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>
> > > >>> >>>> --
> > > >>> >>>> *Christian Posta*
> > > >>> >>>> twitter: @christianposta
> > > >>> >>>> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> > > >>> >>>> http://fabric8.io
> > > >>> >>>
> > > >>> >>>
> > > >>> >>>
> > > >>> >>> --
> > > >>> >>> Hiram Chirino
> > > >>> >>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> > > >>> >>> [hidden email] <javascript:;> | fusesource.com |
> redhat.com
> > > >>> >>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
> > > >>> >>>
> > > >>> >
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Clebert Suconic
> > > http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@...
> > > http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Christian Posta*
> twitter: @christianposta
> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> http://fabric8.io
>



--
*Christian Posta*
twitter: @christianposta
http://www.christianposta.com/blog
http://fabric8.io
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Naming Suggestions?

Justin Bertram-2
That's not a definition of "reactive."  It's just an example of its use.  What does it actually mean that the broker is "reactive"?


Justin

----- Original Message -----
From: "Christian Posta" <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email]
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 12:28:53 PM
Subject: Re: Naming Suggestions?

I like jstrachan's definition: "based on a different, reactive/netty broker
kernel"

On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Justin Bertram <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Any of those in favor of "Reactive"...In the event that this name is
> actually chosen, do you have a simple definition of what "reactive" means
> in this context so it can explained to those who don't know?
>
> I don't particularly care what it's code-named.  You could call it
> "Bertha" if you like.  I don't think it matters much at the end of the day.
>
>
> Justin
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Christian Posta" <[hidden email]>
> To: [hidden email]
> Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 11:16:58 AM
> Subject: Re: Naming Suggestions?
>
> I like that! REActiveMQ
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Dejan Bosanac <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > I like Reactive, as it also gives nice options for logo and other visual
> > stuff, like (RE)ActiveMQ
> >
> > Regards
> > --
> > Dejan Bosanac
> > ----------------------
> > Red Hat, Inc.
> > [hidden email]
> > Twitter: @dejanb
> > Blog: http://sensatic.net
> > ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Clebert Suconic <
> > [hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >  I am.. but I thought about the coffee  :)
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:12 AM, James Carman
> > > <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > No Battlestar Galactica fans?
> > > >
> > > > On Friday, April 10, 2015, James Carman <[hidden email]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> How about Starbuck?
> > > >>
> > > >> On Friday, April 10, 2015, Gary Tully <[hidden email]
> > > >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[hidden email]');>> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> I am with you Martyn, something very easy to spell and pronounce
> > would
> > > >>> be my preference too :-)
> > > >>> Luna hits the mark.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On 10 April 2015 at 10:37, Martyn Taylor <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > > >>> > After being stung in the past working on the "Aeolus" project.
> I'd
> > > >>> prefer
> > > >>> > to have a name that is super easy to spell and pronounce. Artemis
> > is
> > > >>> pushing
> > > >>> > it a little for me.
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > How about something really simple, like "Luna", Roman moon
> goddess.
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > On 09/04/15 14:18, James Carman wrote:
> > > >>> >>
> > > >>> >> It is a good name.  Do we need to engage trademarks@ for code
> > > names?
> > > >>> >>
> > > >>> >> On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Hiram Chirino <
> [hidden email]
> > >
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>> >>
> > > >>> >>> I do like Artemis.  ActiveMQ Artemis has a nice ring to it.
> > > >>> >>>
> > > >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Christian Posta
> > > >>> >>> <[hidden email] <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > >>> >>>>
> > > >>> >>>> Nice, Dan! ArtemisMQ! I like it.
> > > >>> >>>>
> > > >>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Daniel Kulp <[hidden email]
> > > >>> >>>
> > > >>> >>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > >>> >>>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>>> On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <
> > > [hidden email]
> > > >>> >>>
> > > >>> >>> <javascript:;>>
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>> wrote:
> > > >>> >>>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>>> Naming things is hard.  If we gave the hornetq code grant a
> > code
> > > >>> name
> > > >>> >>>>>> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid
> > lots
> > > >>> of TM
> > > >>> >>>>>> confusion.  Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good
> > > name
> > > >>> to
> > > >>> >>>>>> give it?
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>> Hermes?    That would be Apollo’s half brother.
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>> Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>> Dan
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>>> --
> > > >>> >>>>>> Hiram Chirino
> > > >>> >>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> > > >>> >>>>>> [hidden email] <javascript:;> | fusesource.com |
> > > redhat.com
> > > >>> >>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>> --
> > > >>> >>>>> Daniel Kulp
> > > >>> >>>>> [hidden email] <javascript:;> - http://dankulp.com/blog
> > > >>> >>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>>
> > > >>> >>>>
> > > >>> >>>> --
> > > >>> >>>> *Christian Posta*
> > > >>> >>>> twitter: @christianposta
> > > >>> >>>> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> > > >>> >>>> http://fabric8.io
> > > >>> >>>
> > > >>> >>>
> > > >>> >>>
> > > >>> >>> --
> > > >>> >>> Hiram Chirino
> > > >>> >>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> > > >>> >>> [hidden email] <javascript:;> | fusesource.com |
> redhat.com
> > > >>> >>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
> > > >>> >>>
> > > >>> >
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Clebert Suconic
> > > http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@...
> > > http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Christian Posta*
> twitter: @christianposta
> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> http://fabric8.io
>



--
*Christian Posta*
twitter: @christianposta
http://www.christianposta.com/blog
http://fabric8.io
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Naming Suggestions?

Mark Frazier
In reply to this post by James Carman
If you want a BSG theme, what about “Number 6”.

Too racy?


> On Apr 10, 2015, at 9:51 AM, James Carman <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Yes a BSG fan!  Baltar would work
>
> On Friday, April 10, 2015, Andy Taylor <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Or Baltar ;)
>> On 10 Apr 2015 17:41, "James Carman" <[hidden email]
>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>
>>> Bertha, I like that.  If we are using an alphabetic progression, then
>> that
>>> could come after Apollo. :)
>>>
>>> On Friday, April 10, 2015, Justin Bertram <[hidden email]
>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Any of those in favor of "Reactive"...In the event that this name is
>>>> actually chosen, do you have a simple definition of what "reactive"
>> means
>>>> in this context so it can explained to those who don't know?
>>>>
>>>> I don't particularly care what it's code-named.  You could call it
>>>> "Bertha" if you like.  I don't think it matters much at the end of the
>>> day.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Justin
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Christian Posta" <[hidden email] <javascript:;>
>> <javascript:;>>
>>>> To: [hidden email] <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
>>>> Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 11:16:58 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: Naming Suggestions?
>>>>
>>>> I like that! REActiveMQ
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Dejan Bosanac <[hidden email]
>> <javascript:;>
>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I like Reactive, as it also gives nice options for logo and other
>>> visual
>>>>> stuff, like (RE)ActiveMQ
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> --
>>>>> Dejan Bosanac
>>>>> ----------------------
>>>>> Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>> [hidden email] <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
>>>>> Twitter: @dejanb
>>>>> Blog: http://sensatic.net
>>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Clebert Suconic <
>>>>> [hidden email] <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I am.. but I thought about the coffee  :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:12 AM, James Carman
>>>>>> <[hidden email] <javascript:;> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>>>> No Battlestar Galactica fans?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Friday, April 10, 2015, James Carman <
>>> [hidden email] <javascript:;>
>>>> <javascript:;>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How about Starbuck?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Friday, April 10, 2015, Gary Tully <[hidden email]
>> <javascript:;>
>>>> <javascript:;>
>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[hidden email]
>> <javascript:;>
>>> <javascript:;>');>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I am with you Martyn, something very easy to spell and
>> pronounce
>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>> be my preference too :-)
>>>>>>>>> Luna hits the mark.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 10 April 2015 at 10:37, Martyn Taylor <[hidden email]
>> <javascript:;>
>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> After being stung in the past working on the "Aeolus"
>> project.
>>>> I'd
>>>>>>>>> prefer
>>>>>>>>>> to have a name that is super easy to spell and pronounce.
>>> Artemis
>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>> pushing
>>>>>>>>>> it a little for me.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> How about something really simple, like "Luna", Roman moon
>>>> goddess.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 09/04/15 14:18, James Carman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It is a good name.  Do we need to engage trademarks@ for
>> code
>>>>>> names?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Hiram Chirino <
>>>> [hidden email] <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I do like Artemis.  ActiveMQ Artemis has a nice ring to it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Christian Posta
>>>>>>>>>>>> <[hidden email] <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
>> <javascript:;>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nice, Dan! ArtemisMQ! I like it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Daniel Kulp <
>>> [hidden email] <javascript:;>
>>>> <javascript:;>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <
>>>>>> [hidden email] <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Naming things is hard.  If we gave the hornetq code
>> grant
>>> a
>>>>> code
>>>>>>>>> name
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be
>>> avoid
>>>>> lots
>>>>>>>>> of TM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> confusion.  Anybody have any suggestion what would be a
>>> good
>>>>>> name
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hermes?    That would be Apollo’s half brother.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hiram Chirino
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email] <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
>> <javascript:;> |
>>>> fusesource.com |
>>>>>> redhat.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel Kulp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email] <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
>> <javascript:;> -
>>>> http://dankulp.com/blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Christian Posta*
>>>>>>>>>>>>> twitter: @christianposta
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://fabric8.io
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hiram Chirino
>>>>>>>>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email] <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
>> <javascript:;> |
>>>> fusesource.com | redhat.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Clebert Suconic
>>>>>> http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@...
>>>>>> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> *Christian Posta*
>>>> twitter: @christianposta
>>>> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
>>>> http://fabric8.io
>>>>
>>>
>>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Naming Suggestions?

rajdavies
In reply to this post by Justin Bertram-2
Message processing is done by one thread driven event loop- like node.js. Though in reality, it would be multi reactor - with multiple event loops - maybe one per core. Apollo,HornetQ, vert.x are examples of this using this pattern



> On 10 Apr 2015, at 18:42, Justin Bertram <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> That's not a definition of "reactive."  It's just an example of its use.  What does it actually mean that the broker is "reactive"?
>
>
> Justin
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Christian Posta" <[hidden email]>
> To: [hidden email]
> Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 12:28:53 PM
> Subject: Re: Naming Suggestions?
>
> I like jstrachan's definition: "based on a different, reactive/netty broker
> kernel"
>
>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Justin Bertram <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> Any of those in favor of "Reactive"...In the event that this name is
>> actually chosen, do you have a simple definition of what "reactive" means
>> in this context so it can explained to those who don't know?
>>
>> I don't particularly care what it's code-named.  You could call it
>> "Bertha" if you like.  I don't think it matters much at the end of the day.
>>
>>
>> Justin
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Christian Posta" <[hidden email]>
>> To: [hidden email]
>> Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 11:16:58 AM
>> Subject: Re: Naming Suggestions?
>>
>> I like that! REActiveMQ
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Dejan Bosanac <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I like Reactive, as it also gives nice options for logo and other visual
>>> stuff, like (RE)ActiveMQ
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> --
>>> Dejan Bosanac
>>> ----------------------
>>> Red Hat, Inc.
>>> [hidden email]
>>> Twitter: @dejanb
>>> Blog: http://sensatic.net
>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Clebert Suconic <
>>> [hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I am.. but I thought about the coffee  :)
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:12 AM, James Carman
>>>> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>> No Battlestar Galactica fans?
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Friday, April 10, 2015, James Carman <[hidden email]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> How about Starbuck?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Friday, April 10, 2015, Gary Tully <[hidden email]
>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[hidden email]');>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am with you Martyn, something very easy to spell and pronounce
>>> would
>>>>>>> be my preference too :-)
>>>>>>> Luna hits the mark.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 10 April 2015 at 10:37, Martyn Taylor <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> After being stung in the past working on the "Aeolus" project.
>> I'd
>>>>>>> prefer
>>>>>>>> to have a name that is super easy to spell and pronounce. Artemis
>>> is
>>>>>>> pushing
>>>>>>>> it a little for me.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How about something really simple, like "Luna", Roman moon
>> goddess.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 09/04/15 14:18, James Carman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It is a good name.  Do we need to engage trademarks@ for code
>>>> names?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Hiram Chirino <
>> [hidden email]
>>>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I do like Artemis.  ActiveMQ Artemis has a nice ring to it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Christian Posta
>>>>>>>>>> <[hidden email] <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Nice, Dan! ArtemisMQ! I like it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Daniel Kulp <[hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <
>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Naming things is hard.  If we gave the hornetq code grant a
>>> code
>>>>>>> name
>>>>>>>>>>>>> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid
>>> lots
>>>>>>> of TM
>>>>>>>>>>>>> confusion.  Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good
>>>> name
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> give it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hermes?    That would be Apollo’s half brother.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dan
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hiram Chirino
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email] <javascript:;> | fusesource.com |
>>>> redhat.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel Kulp
>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email] <javascript:;> - http://dankulp.com/blog
>>>>>>>>>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> *Christian Posta*
>>>>>>>>>>> twitter: @christianposta
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
>>>>>>>>>>> http://fabric8.io
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Hiram Chirino
>>>>>>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email] <javascript:;> | fusesource.com |
>> redhat.com
>>>>>>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Clebert Suconic
>>>> http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@...
>>>> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Christian Posta*
>> twitter: @christianposta
>> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
>> http://fabric8.io
>
>
>
> --
> *Christian Posta*
> twitter: @christianposta
> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> http://fabric8.io
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Naming Suggestions?

James Strachan-2
In reply to this post by Justin Bertram-2
For background on the reactive movement - which is often
netty/disruptor/actor based - see:
http://www.reactivemanifesto.org

It's generally an approach to concurrency/threads/IO to achieve mechanical
sympathy & high performance

On Friday, April 10, 2015, Justin Bertram <[hidden email]> wrote:

> That's not a definition of "reactive."  It's just an example of its use.
> What does it actually mean that the broker is "reactive"?
>
>
> Justin
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Christian Posta" <[hidden email] <javascript:;>>
> To: [hidden email] <javascript:;>
> Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 12:28:53 PM
> Subject: Re: Naming Suggestions?
>
> I like jstrachan's definition: "based on a different, reactive/netty broker
> kernel"
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Justin Bertram <[hidden email]
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
> > Any of those in favor of "Reactive"...In the event that this name is
> > actually chosen, do you have a simple definition of what "reactive" means
> > in this context so it can explained to those who don't know?
> >
> > I don't particularly care what it's code-named.  You could call it
> > "Bertha" if you like.  I don't think it matters much at the end of the
> day.
> >
> >
> > Justin
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Christian Posta" <[hidden email] <javascript:;>>
> > To: [hidden email] <javascript:;>
> > Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 11:16:58 AM
> > Subject: Re: Naming Suggestions?
> >
> > I like that! REActiveMQ
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Dejan Bosanac <[hidden email]
> <javascript:;>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I like Reactive, as it also gives nice options for logo and other
> visual
> > > stuff, like (RE)ActiveMQ
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > --
> > > Dejan Bosanac
> > > ----------------------
> > > Red Hat, Inc.
> > > [hidden email] <javascript:;>
> > > Twitter: @dejanb
> > > Blog: http://sensatic.net
> > > ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Clebert Suconic <
> > > [hidden email] <javascript:;>>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >  I am.. but I thought about the coffee  :)
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:12 AM, James Carman
> > > > <[hidden email] <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > > > No Battlestar Galactica fans?
> > > > >
> > > > > On Friday, April 10, 2015, James Carman <
> [hidden email] <javascript:;>>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> How about Starbuck?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Friday, April 10, 2015, Gary Tully <[hidden email]
> <javascript:;>
> > > > >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[hidden email] <javascript:;>');>>
> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> I am with you Martyn, something very easy to spell and pronounce
> > > would
> > > > >>> be my preference too :-)
> > > > >>> Luna hits the mark.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> On 10 April 2015 at 10:37, Martyn Taylor <[hidden email]
> <javascript:;>>
> > wrote:
> > > > >>> > After being stung in the past working on the "Aeolus" project.
> > I'd
> > > > >>> prefer
> > > > >>> > to have a name that is super easy to spell and pronounce.
> Artemis
> > > is
> > > > >>> pushing
> > > > >>> > it a little for me.
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > How about something really simple, like "Luna", Roman moon
> > goddess.
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > On 09/04/15 14:18, James Carman wrote:
> > > > >>> >>
> > > > >>> >> It is a good name.  Do we need to engage trademarks@ for code
> > > > names?
> > > > >>> >>
> > > > >>> >> On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Hiram Chirino <
> > [hidden email] <javascript:;>
> > > >
> > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > >>> >>
> > > > >>> >>> I do like Artemis.  ActiveMQ Artemis has a nice ring to it.
> > > > >>> >>>
> > > > >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Christian Posta
> > > > >>> >>> <[hidden email] <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> > > > >>> >>>>
> > > > >>> >>>> Nice, Dan! ArtemisMQ! I like it.
> > > > >>> >>>>
> > > > >>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Daniel Kulp <
> [hidden email] <javascript:;>
> > > > >>> >>>
> > > > >>> >>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > > >>> >>>>>>
> > > > >>> >>>>>> On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <
> > > > [hidden email] <javascript:;>
> > > > >>> >>>
> > > > >>> >>> <javascript:;>>
> > > > >>> >>>>>
> > > > >>> >>>>> wrote:
> > > > >>> >>>>>>
> > > > >>> >>>>>> Naming things is hard.  If we gave the hornetq code grant
> a
> > > code
> > > > >>> name
> > > > >>> >>>>>> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be
> avoid
> > > lots
> > > > >>> of TM
> > > > >>> >>>>>> confusion.  Anybody have any suggestion what would be a
> good
> > > > name
> > > > >>> to
> > > > >>> >>>>>> give it?
> > > > >>> >>>>>
> > > > >>> >>>>> Hermes?    That would be Apollo’s half brother.
> > > > >>> >>>>>
> > > > >>> >>>>> Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
> > > > >>> >>>>>
> > > > >>> >>>>>
> > > > >>> >>>>> Dan
> > > > >>> >>>>>
> > > > >>> >>>>>
> > > > >>> >>>>>
> > > > >>> >>>>>> --
> > > > >>> >>>>>> Hiram Chirino
> > > > >>> >>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> > > > >>> >>>>>> [hidden email] <javascript:;> <javascript:;> |
> fusesource.com |
> > > > redhat.com
> > > > >>> >>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
> > > > >>> >>>>>
> > > > >>> >>>>> --
> > > > >>> >>>>> Daniel Kulp
> > > > >>> >>>>> [hidden email] <javascript:;> <javascript:;> -
> http://dankulp.com/blog
> > > > >>> >>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> > > > >>> >>>>>
> > > > >>> >>>>>
> > > > >>> >>>>
> > > > >>> >>>> --
> > > > >>> >>>> *Christian Posta*
> > > > >>> >>>> twitter: @christianposta
> > > > >>> >>>> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> > > > >>> >>>> http://fabric8.io
> > > > >>> >>>
> > > > >>> >>>
> > > > >>> >>>
> > > > >>> >>> --
> > > > >>> >>> Hiram Chirino
> > > > >>> >>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> > > > >>> >>> [hidden email] <javascript:;> <javascript:;> |
> fusesource.com |
> > redhat.com
> > > > >>> >>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
> > > > >>> >>>
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Clebert Suconic
> > > > http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@...
> > > > http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Christian Posta*
> > twitter: @christianposta
> > http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> > http://fabric8.io
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Christian Posta*
> twitter: @christianposta
> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> http://fabric8.io
>


--
James
-------
Red Hat

Twitter: @jstrachan
Email: [hidden email]
Blog: http://macstrac.blogspot.com/

hawtio: http:/ <http://fusesource.com/>/hawt.io/
fabric8: http:/ <http://fusesource.com/>/fabric8.io/

Open Source Integration
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Naming Suggestions?

David Jencks
Interesting…. long ago I read a book written by some IBM guy circa 1980 that basically proposed this architecture using batch jobs on a mainframe, with the same load characteristics and advantages… and arguments.  Maybe it will get farther this time.

Also, I'm fine with activemq-reactive for a name.  Don't mind artemis or luna either.

david jencks

On Apr 10, 2015, at 3:00 PM, James Strachan <[hidden email]> wrote:

> For background on the reactive movement - which is often
> netty/disruptor/actor based - see:
> http://www.reactivemanifesto.org
>
> It's generally an approach to concurrency/threads/IO to achieve mechanical
> sympathy & high performance
>
> On Friday, April 10, 2015, Justin Bertram <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> That's not a definition of "reactive."  It's just an example of its use.
>> What does it actually mean that the broker is "reactive"?
>>
>>
>> Justin
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Christian Posta" <[hidden email] <javascript:;>>
>> To: [hidden email] <javascript:;>
>> Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 12:28:53 PM
>> Subject: Re: Naming Suggestions?
>>
>> I like jstrachan's definition: "based on a different, reactive/netty broker
>> kernel"
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Justin Bertram <[hidden email]
>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>
>>> Any of those in favor of "Reactive"...In the event that this name is
>>> actually chosen, do you have a simple definition of what "reactive" means
>>> in this context so it can explained to those who don't know?
>>>
>>> I don't particularly care what it's code-named.  You could call it
>>> "Bertha" if you like.  I don't think it matters much at the end of the
>> day.
>>>
>>>
>>> Justin
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Christian Posta" <[hidden email] <javascript:;>>
>>> To: [hidden email] <javascript:;>
>>> Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 11:16:58 AM
>>> Subject: Re: Naming Suggestions?
>>>
>>> I like that! REActiveMQ
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Dejan Bosanac <[hidden email]
>> <javascript:;>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I like Reactive, as it also gives nice options for logo and other
>> visual
>>>> stuff, like (RE)ActiveMQ
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> --
>>>> Dejan Bosanac
>>>> ----------------------
>>>> Red Hat, Inc.
>>>> [hidden email] <javascript:;>
>>>> Twitter: @dejanb
>>>> Blog: http://sensatic.net
>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Clebert Suconic <
>>>> [hidden email] <javascript:;>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I am.. but I thought about the coffee  :)
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:12 AM, James Carman
>>>>> <[hidden email] <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>>> No Battlestar Galactica fans?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Friday, April 10, 2015, James Carman <
>> [hidden email] <javascript:;>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How about Starbuck?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Friday, April 10, 2015, Gary Tully <[hidden email]
>> <javascript:;>
>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[hidden email] <javascript:;>');>>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am with you Martyn, something very easy to spell and pronounce
>>>> would
>>>>>>>> be my preference too :-)
>>>>>>>> Luna hits the mark.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 10 April 2015 at 10:37, Martyn Taylor <[hidden email]
>> <javascript:;>>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> After being stung in the past working on the "Aeolus" project.
>>> I'd
>>>>>>>> prefer
>>>>>>>>> to have a name that is super easy to spell and pronounce.
>> Artemis
>>>> is
>>>>>>>> pushing
>>>>>>>>> it a little for me.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How about something really simple, like "Luna", Roman moon
>>> goddess.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 09/04/15 14:18, James Carman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It is a good name.  Do we need to engage trademarks@ for code
>>>>> names?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Hiram Chirino <
>>> [hidden email] <javascript:;>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I do like Artemis.  ActiveMQ Artemis has a nice ring to it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Christian Posta
>>>>>>>>>>> <[hidden email] <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Nice, Dan! ArtemisMQ! I like it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Daniel Kulp <
>> [hidden email] <javascript:;>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <
>>>>> [hidden email] <javascript:;>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Naming things is hard.  If we gave the hornetq code grant
>> a
>>>> code
>>>>>>>> name
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be
>> avoid
>>>> lots
>>>>>>>> of TM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> confusion.  Anybody have any suggestion what would be a
>> good
>>>>> name
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hermes?    That would be Apollo’s half brother.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hiram Chirino
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email] <javascript:;> <javascript:;> |
>> fusesource.com |
>>>>> redhat.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel Kulp
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email] <javascript:;> <javascript:;> -
>> http://dankulp.com/blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> *Christian Posta*
>>>>>>>>>>>> twitter: @christianposta
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://fabric8.io
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Hiram Chirino
>>>>>>>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email] <javascript:;> <javascript:;> |
>> fusesource.com |
>>> redhat.com
>>>>>>>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Clebert Suconic
>>>>> http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@...
>>>>> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Christian Posta*
>>> twitter: @christianposta
>>> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
>>> http://fabric8.io
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Christian Posta*
>> twitter: @christianposta
>> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
>> http://fabric8.io
>>
>
>
> --
> James
> -------
> Red Hat
>
> Twitter: @jstrachan
> Email: [hidden email]
> Blog: http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
>
> hawtio: http:/ <http://fusesource.com/>/hawt.io/
> fabric8: http:/ <http://fusesource.com/>/fabric8.io/
>
> Open Source Integration

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Naming Suggestions?

dlalaina
I like easy names too:

ActiveMQ Led
ActiveMQ Pulse
ActiveMQ Nova
ActiveMQ Dwarf
ActiveMQ Luna
ActiveMQ Puma
ActiveMQ Eagle
ActiveMQ Gorilla
ActiveMQ Fox
ActiveMQ Anna
ActiveMQ Guarani
ActiveMQ Avant

[]'s
Daniel La Laina

On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 6:15 PM, David Jencks [via ActiveMQ] <[hidden email]> wrote:
Interesting…. long ago I read a book written by some IBM guy circa 1980 that basically proposed this architecture using batch jobs on a mainframe, with the same load characteristics and advantages… and arguments.  Maybe it will get farther this time.

Also, I'm fine with activemq-reactive for a name.  Don't mind artemis or luna either.

david jencks

On Apr 10, 2015, at 3:00 PM, James Strachan <[hidden email]> wrote:

> For background on the reactive movement - which is often
> netty/disruptor/actor based - see:
> http://www.reactivemanifesto.org
>
> It's generally an approach to concurrency/threads/IO to achieve mechanical
> sympathy & high performance
>
> On Friday, April 10, 2015, Justin Bertram <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> That's not a definition of "reactive."  It's just an example of its use.
>> What does it actually mean that the broker is "reactive"?
>>
>>
>> Justin
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Christian Posta" <[hidden email] <javascript:;>>
>> To: [hidden email] <javascript:;>
>> Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 12:28:53 PM
>> Subject: Re: Naming Suggestions?
>>
>> I like jstrachan's definition: "based on a different, reactive/netty broker
>> kernel"
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Justin Bertram <[hidden email]
>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>
>>> Any of those in favor of "Reactive"...In the event that this name is
>>> actually chosen, do you have a simple definition of what "reactive" means
>>> in this context so it can explained to those who don't know?
>>>
>>> I don't particularly care what it's code-named.  You could call it
>>> "Bertha" if you like.  I don't think it matters much at the end of the
>> day.
>>>
>>>
>>> Justin
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Christian Posta" <[hidden email] <javascript:;>>
>>> To: [hidden email] <javascript:;>
>>> Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 11:16:58 AM
>>> Subject: Re: Naming Suggestions?
>>>
>>> I like that! REActiveMQ
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Dejan Bosanac <[hidden email]
>> <javascript:;>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I like Reactive, as it also gives nice options for logo and other
>> visual
>>>> stuff, like (RE)ActiveMQ
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> --
>>>> Dejan Bosanac
>>>> ----------------------
>>>> Red Hat, Inc.
>>>> [hidden email] <javascript:;>
>>>> Twitter: @dejanb
>>>> Blog: http://sensatic.net
>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Clebert Suconic <
>>>> [hidden email] <javascript:;>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I am.. but I thought about the coffee  :)
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:12 AM, James Carman
>>>>> <[hidden email] <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>>> No Battlestar Galactica fans?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Friday, April 10, 2015, James Carman <
>> [hidden email] <javascript:;>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How about Starbuck?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Friday, April 10, 2015, Gary Tully <[hidden email]
>> <javascript:;>
>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[hidden email] <javascript:;>');>>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am with you Martyn, something very easy to spell and pronounce
>>>> would
>>>>>>>> be my preference too :-)
>>>>>>>> Luna hits the mark.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 10 April 2015 at 10:37, Martyn Taylor <[hidden email]
>> <javascript:;>>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> After being stung in the past working on the "Aeolus" project.
>>> I'd
>>>>>>>> prefer
>>>>>>>>> to have a name that is super easy to spell and pronounce.
>> Artemis
>>>> is
>>>>>>>> pushing
>>>>>>>>> it a little for me.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How about something really simple, like "Luna", Roman moon
>>> goddess.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 09/04/15 14:18, James Carman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It is a good name.  Do we need to engage trademarks@ for code
>>>>> names?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Hiram Chirino <
>>> [hidden email] <javascript:;>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I do like Artemis.  ActiveMQ Artemis has a nice ring to it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Christian Posta
>>>>>>>>>>> <[hidden email] <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Nice, Dan! ArtemisMQ! I like it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Daniel Kulp <
>> [hidden email] <javascript:;>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <
>>>>> [hidden email] <javascript:;>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Naming things is hard.  If we gave the hornetq code grant
>> a
>>>> code
>>>>>>>> name
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be
>> avoid
>>>> lots
>>>>>>>> of TM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> confusion.  Anybody have any suggestion what would be a
>> good
>>>>> name
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hermes?    That would be Apollo’s half brother.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hiram Chirino
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email] <javascript:;> <javascript:;> |
>> fusesource.com |
>>>>> redhat.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel Kulp
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email] <javascript:;> <javascript:;> -
>> http://dankulp.com/blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> *Christian Posta*
>>>>>>>>>>>> twitter: @christianposta
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://fabric8.io
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Hiram Chirino
>>>>>>>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email] <javascript:;> <javascript:;> |
>> fusesource.com |
>>> redhat.com
>>>>>>>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Clebert Suconic
>>>>> http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@...
>>>>> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Christian Posta*
>>> twitter: @christianposta
>>> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
>>> http://fabric8.io
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Christian Posta*
>> twitter: @christianposta
>> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
>> http://fabric8.io
>>
>
>
> --
> James
> -------
> Red Hat
>
> Twitter: @jstrachan
> Email: [hidden email]
> Blog: http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
>
> hawtio: http:/ <http://fusesource.com/>/hawt.io/
> fabric8: http:/ <http://fusesource.com/>/fabric8.io/
>
> Open Source Integration



If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Naming-Suggestions-tp4694553p4694738.html
To start a new topic under ActiveMQ - Dev, email [hidden email]
To unsubscribe from ActiveMQ - Dev, click here.
NAML

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Naming Suggestions?

Krzysztof Sobkowiak
In reply to this post by jgomes
What about ActiveMQ-NG (New/Next Generation)?

Regards
Krzysztof

On 09.04.2015 02:39, Jim Gomes wrote:

> I vote for ActiveMQ-RS. Four reasons:
>
> 1. RS stands for Research.
> 2. RS is alphabetically sequential after Q, and it's fun to say.
> 3. Seriously doubt it'll clash with a trademarked name.
> 4. Fits with our other existing sub-project naming conventions
> (ActiveMQ-NMS, ActiveMQ-CPP, etc.).
>  On Apr 8, 2015 3:06 PM, "Greg Stein" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 05:34:37PM -0400, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>> ...
>>> That said, since what we are talking about is a code name and not a
>>> name of a *Project* SHOULD be easier (but again, we'll verify with
>>> trademarks@ when we've decided on  name).   The name should always
>>> be referred to as "Apache ActiveMQ-BLAH" and never "Apache BLAH" or
>>> just "BLAH".  The exception would be the normal dev chatter on our
>>> dev list.  This is just like the Apache ActiveMQ-NMS and Apache
>>> ActiveMQ-CMS we have now.
>> Right. Since "ActiveMQ" will be in its release name, you've already
>> got your trademark bits handled, and avoided conflict with anything
>> else. Find a codename and move along. trademarks@ isn't really needed
>> as long as it remains a sub-name of ActiveMQ. Chris is just reacting
>> strongly because of the past use of HornetQ, which is RH's mark. That
>> is past, so we can skip worrying about that.
>>
>> I look forward to your choices, and the Board report in a couple weeks.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> -g
>>

--
Krzysztof Sobkowiak

JEE & OSS Architect
Apache Software Foundation Member
Apache ServiceMix <http://servicemix.apache.org/> Committer & PMC chair
Senior Solution Architect @ Capgemini SSC <http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/en/>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Naming Suggestions?

Bruce Snyder
In reply to this post by chirino
+1

Bruce

On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 7:08 AM, Hiram Chirino <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> I do like Artemis.  ActiveMQ Artemis has a nice ring to it.
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Christian Posta
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > Nice, Dan! ArtemisMQ! I like it.
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Daniel Kulp <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> > On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <[hidden email]>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Naming things is hard.  If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
> >> > other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM
> >> > confusion.  Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to
> >> > give it?
> >>
> >> Hermes?    That would be Apollo’s half brother.
> >>
> >> Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
> >>
> >>
> >> Dan
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Hiram Chirino
> >> > Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> >> > [hidden email] | fusesource.com | redhat.com
> >> > skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
> >>
> >> --
> >> Daniel Kulp
> >> [hidden email] - http://dankulp.com/blog
> >> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Christian Posta*
> > twitter: @christianposta
> > http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> > http://fabric8.io
>
>
>
> --
> Hiram Chirino
> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> [hidden email] | fusesource.com | redhat.com
> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>



--
perl -e 'print
unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'

ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Naming Suggestions?

clebertsuconic
In reply to this post by Krzysztof Sobkowiak
I liked ng at first. But reactive made a very cool name.

-- Clebert Suconic typing on the iPhone.

> On Apr 11, 2015, at 06:03, Krzysztof Sobkowiak <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> What about ActiveMQ-NG (New/Next Generation)?
>
> Regards
> Krzysztof
>
>> On 09.04.2015 02:39, Jim Gomes wrote:
>> I vote for ActiveMQ-RS. Four reasons:
>>
>> 1. RS stands for Research.
>> 2. RS is alphabetically sequential after Q, and it's fun to say.
>> 3. Seriously doubt it'll clash with a trademarked name.
>> 4. Fits with our other existing sub-project naming conventions
>> (ActiveMQ-NMS, ActiveMQ-CPP, etc.).
>>> On Apr 8, 2015 3:06 PM, "Greg Stein" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 05:34:37PM -0400, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>>> ...
>>>> That said, since what we are talking about is a code name and not a
>>>> name of a *Project* SHOULD be easier (but again, we'll verify with
>>>> trademarks@ when we've decided on  name).   The name should always
>>>> be referred to as "Apache ActiveMQ-BLAH" and never "Apache BLAH" or
>>>> just "BLAH".  The exception would be the normal dev chatter on our
>>>> dev list.  This is just like the Apache ActiveMQ-NMS and Apache
>>>> ActiveMQ-CMS we have now.
>>> Right. Since "ActiveMQ" will be in its release name, you've already
>>> got your trademark bits handled, and avoided conflict with anything
>>> else. Find a codename and move along. trademarks@ isn't really needed
>>> as long as it remains a sub-name of ActiveMQ. Chris is just reacting
>>> strongly because of the past use of HornetQ, which is RH's mark. That
>>> is past, so we can skip worrying about that.
>>>
>>> I look forward to your choices, and the Board report in a couple weeks.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> -g
>
> --
> Krzysztof Sobkowiak
>
> JEE & OSS Architect
> Apache Software Foundation Member
> Apache ServiceMix <http://servicemix.apache.org/> Committer & PMC chair
> Senior Solution Architect @ Capgemini SSC <http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/en/>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Naming Suggestions?

jbonofre
In reply to this post by dkulp
+1 for Artemis

Regards
JB

On 04/08/2015 10:41 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:

>
>> On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> Naming things is hard.  If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
>> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM
>> confusion.  Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to
>> give it?
>
> Hermes?    That would be Apollo’s half brother.
>
> Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
>
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>>
>> --
>> Hiram Chirino
>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>> [hidden email] | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>

--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[hidden email]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Naming Suggestions?

chirino
So I'm about to start a vote thread to pick from the name option
posted on this thread.  I'm only going to include options posted on
this thread that have received a +1 from someone else to help reduce
the options a bit.  If you like an option that was posted, but have
not seen anyone else +1 it, please +1 it soon :)

Right now the only ones with +1 are:
ActiveMQ Artemis
ActiveMQ Luna
ActiveMQ Reactive

Regards,
HIram

On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 2:12 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[hidden email]> wrote:

> +1 for Artemis
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 04/08/2015 10:41 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Naming things is hard.  If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
>>> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM
>>> confusion.  Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to
>>> give it?
>>
>>
>> Hermes?    That would be Apollo’s half brother.
>>
>> Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
>>
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Hiram Chirino
>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>>> [hidden email] | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>
>>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> [hidden email]
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com



--
Hiram Chirino
Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
[hidden email] | fusesource.com | redhat.com
skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
123