HEADS-UP 2.7.1 in 1 week

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
8 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

HEADS-UP 2.7.1 in 1 week

clebertsuconic
I would like to do a 2.7.1 release one week from now.


if you can't make it 2.7.1 on your changes.. don't worry.. we can wait 2.7.2


(so far there's no features on master.. so it will progress as
2.7.1... if in 1 week from now anyone commits a major feature I will
decide if the feature is production ready and either make a 2.8.0 or
branch 2.7.x).

--
Clebert Suconic
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: HEADS-UP 2.7.1 in 1 week

michael.andre.pearce
Have sent a small pr its a minor feature if it can make it please.




Get Outlook for Android







On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 10:16 PM +0100, "Clebert Suconic" <[hidden email]> wrote:










I would like to do a 2.7.1 release one week from now.


if you can't make it 2.7.1 on your changes.. don't worry.. we can wait 2.7.2


(so far there's no features on master.. so it will progress as
2.7.1... if in 1 week from now anyone commits a major feature I will
decide if the feature is production ready and either make a 2.8.0 or
branch 2.7.x).

--
Clebert Suconic





Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: HEADS-UP 2.7.1 in 1 week

clebertsuconic
@Michael Pearce I merged it.

I wonder if i could still call it 2.7.1, including both commits, or
should I bump it to 2.8.0.


I want to cut it tomorrow.

On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 1:35 PM <[hidden email]> wrote:

>
> Have sent a small pr its a minor feature if it can make it please.
>
>
>
>
> Get Outlook for Android
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 10:16 PM +0100, "Clebert Suconic" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I would like to do a 2.7.1 release one week from now.
>
>
> if you can't make it 2.7.1 on your changes.. don't worry.. we can wait 2.7.2
>
>
> (so far there's no features on master.. so it will progress as
> 2.7.1... if in 1 week from now anyone commits a major feature I will
> decide if the feature is production ready and either make a 2.8.0 or
> branch 2.7.x).
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic
>
>
>
>
>


--
Clebert Suconic
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: HEADS-UP 2.7.1 in 1 week

clebertsuconic
I will cut it tomorrow.. and name it 2.7.1.

On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 3:49 PM Clebert Suconic
<[hidden email]> wrote:

>
> @Michael Pearce I merged it.
>
> I wonder if i could still call it 2.7.1, including both commits, or
> should I bump it to 2.8.0.
>
>
> I want to cut it tomorrow.
>
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 1:35 PM <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > Have sent a small pr its a minor feature if it can make it please.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Get Outlook for Android
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 10:16 PM +0100, "Clebert Suconic" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I would like to do a 2.7.1 release one week from now.
> >
> >
> > if you can't make it 2.7.1 on your changes.. don't worry.. we can wait 2.7.2
> >
> >
> > (so far there's no features on master.. so it will progress as
> > 2.7.1... if in 1 week from now anyone commits a major feature I will
> > decide if the feature is production ready and either make a 2.8.0 or
> > branch 2.7.x).
> >
> > --
> > Clebert Suconic
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic



--
Clebert Suconic
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: HEADS-UP 2.7.1 in 1 week

Robbie Gemmell
As mentioned on
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2619#issuecomment-484008358,
this feels more appropriate as 2.8.0 given the behaviour changes
present.

On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 21:05, Clebert Suconic <[hidden email]> wrote:

>
> I will cut it tomorrow.. and name it 2.7.1.
>
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 3:49 PM Clebert Suconic
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > @Michael Pearce I merged it.
> >
> > I wonder if i could still call it 2.7.1, including both commits, or
> > should I bump it to 2.8.0.
> >
> >
> > I want to cut it tomorrow.
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 1:35 PM <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Have sent a small pr its a minor feature if it can make it please.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Get Outlook for Android
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 10:16 PM +0100, "Clebert Suconic" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I would like to do a 2.7.1 release one week from now.
> > >
> > >
> > > if you can't make it 2.7.1 on your changes.. don't worry.. we can wait 2.7.2
> > >
> > >
> > > (so far there's no features on master.. so it will progress as
> > > 2.7.1... if in 1 week from now anyone commits a major feature I will
> > > decide if the feature is production ready and either make a 2.8.0 or
> > > branch 2.7.x).
> > >
> > > --
> > > Clebert Suconic
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Clebert Suconic
>
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: HEADS-UP 2.7.1 in 1 week

clebertsuconic
I was considering a minor feature.  But this has been progressing.  So I’m
fine with 2.8.0.

I don’t see a need to make a 2.7.x branch.  Just FYI as the feature seems
production ready and it’s off by default now (after I merge the last PR)

On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 5:34 AM Robbie Gemmell <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> As mentioned on
> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2619#issuecomment-484008358
> ,
> this feels more appropriate as 2.8.0 given the behaviour changes
> present.
>
> On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 21:05, Clebert Suconic <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >
> > I will cut it tomorrow.. and name it 2.7.1.
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 3:49 PM Clebert Suconic
> > <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > >
> > > @Michael Pearce I merged it.
> > >
> > > I wonder if i could still call it 2.7.1, including both commits, or
> > > should I bump it to 2.8.0.
> > >
> > >
> > > I want to cut it tomorrow.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 1:35 PM <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Have sent a small pr its a minor feature if it can make it please.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Get Outlook for Android
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 10:16 PM +0100, "Clebert Suconic" <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I would like to do a 2.7.1 release one week from now.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > if you can't make it 2.7.1 on your changes.. don't worry.. we can
> wait 2.7.2
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > (so far there's no features on master.. so it will progress as
> > > > 2.7.1... if in 1 week from now anyone commits a major feature I will
> > > > decide if the feature is production ready and either make a 2.8.0 or
> > > > branch 2.7.x).
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Clebert Suconic
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Clebert Suconic
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Clebert Suconic
>
--
Clebert Suconic
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: HEADS-UP 2.7.1 in 1 week

clebertsuconic
I do not know if it’s Murthy law.  But I started working on a minor bug
that I wanted included.


Tomorrow is a day before a holiday. So I will push it to early next week.


Sorry about it.

On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 8:23 AM Clebert Suconic <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> I was considering a minor feature.  But this has been progressing.  So I’m
> fine with 2.8.0.
>
> I don’t see a need to make a 2.7.x branch.  Just FYI as the feature seems
> production ready and it’s off by default now (after I merge the last PR)
>
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 5:34 AM Robbie Gemmell <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>> As mentioned on
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2619#issuecomment-484008358
>> ,
>> this feels more appropriate as 2.8.0 given the behaviour changes
>> present.
>>
>> On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 21:05, Clebert Suconic <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > I will cut it tomorrow.. and name it 2.7.1.
>> >
>> > On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 3:49 PM Clebert Suconic
>> > <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > @Michael Pearce I merged it.
>> > >
>> > > I wonder if i could still call it 2.7.1, including both commits, or
>> > > should I bump it to 2.8.0.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > I want to cut it tomorrow.
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 1:35 PM <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Have sent a small pr its a minor feature if it can make it please.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Get Outlook for Android
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 10:16 PM +0100, "Clebert Suconic" <
>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > I would like to do a 2.7.1 release one week from now.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > if you can't make it 2.7.1 on your changes.. don't worry.. we can
>> wait 2.7.2
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > (so far there's no features on master.. so it will progress as
>> > > > 2.7.1... if in 1 week from now anyone commits a major feature I will
>> > > > decide if the feature is production ready and either make a 2.8.0 or
>> > > > branch 2.7.x).
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > Clebert Suconic
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Clebert Suconic
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Clebert Suconic
>>
> --
> Clebert Suconic
>
--
Clebert Suconic
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: HEADS-UP 2.7.1 in 1 week

clebertsuconic
It took me a while.. but I'm pressing it after lunch today.

On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 1:12 PM Clebert Suconic
<[hidden email]> wrote:

>
> I do not know if it’s Murthy law.  But I started working on a minor bug that I wanted included.
>
>
> Tomorrow is a day before a holiday. So I will push it to early next week.
>
>
> Sorry about it.
>
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 8:23 AM Clebert Suconic <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> I was considering a minor feature.  But this has been progressing.  So I’m fine with 2.8.0.
>>
>> I don’t see a need to make a 2.7.x branch.  Just FYI as the feature seems production ready and it’s off by default now (after I merge the last PR)
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 5:34 AM Robbie Gemmell <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>> As mentioned on
>>> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2619#issuecomment-484008358,
>>> this feels more appropriate as 2.8.0 given the behaviour changes
>>> present.
>>>
>>> On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 21:05, Clebert Suconic <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > I will cut it tomorrow.. and name it 2.7.1.
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 3:49 PM Clebert Suconic
>>> > <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > @Michael Pearce I merged it.
>>> > >
>>> > > I wonder if i could still call it 2.7.1, including both commits, or
>>> > > should I bump it to 2.8.0.
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > I want to cut it tomorrow.
>>> > >
>>> > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 1:35 PM <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Have sent a small pr its a minor feature if it can make it please.
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Get Outlook for Android
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 10:16 PM +0100, "Clebert Suconic" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > I would like to do a 2.7.1 release one week from now.
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > if you can't make it 2.7.1 on your changes.. don't worry.. we can wait 2.7.2
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > (so far there's no features on master.. so it will progress as
>>> > > > 2.7.1... if in 1 week from now anyone commits a major feature I will
>>> > > > decide if the feature is production ready and either make a 2.8.0 or
>>> > > > branch 2.7.x).
>>> > > >
>>> > > > --
>>> > > > Clebert Suconic
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > --
>>> > > Clebert Suconic
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Clebert Suconic
>>
>> --
>> Clebert Suconic
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic



--
Clebert Suconic