5.11.2....

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
10 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

5.11.2....

dkulp
It’s been a while since 5.11.1 so I’d like to get a 5.11.2 release out shortly, probably early/mid next week.    There’s not a lot of fixes on the branch right now, just stuff mostly necessary for OSGi to support running ActiveMQ in Karaf4.  

If there are other fixes that people would like to get in, please get them cherry-picked to the activemq-5.11.x branch or send me the git hashes and I can take a look and get them merged.  

Thanks!

--
Daniel Kulp
[hidden email] - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 5.11.2....

paulgale
If possible can AMQ-5903 be included in 5.11.2? It's only on master at the
moment, e.g. destined for 5.12.0.

Thanks,
Paul

On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Daniel Kulp <[hidden email]> wrote:

> It’s been a while since 5.11.1 so I’d like to get a 5.11.2 release out
> shortly, probably early/mid next week.    There’s not a lot of fixes on the
> branch right now, just stuff mostly necessary for OSGi to support running
> ActiveMQ in Karaf4.
>
> If there are other fixes that people would like to get in, please get them
> cherry-picked to the activemq-5.11.x branch or send me the git hashes and I
> can take a look and get them merged.
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> [hidden email] - http://dankulp.com/blog
> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 5.11.2....

dkulp

> On Jul 30, 2015, at 10:44 AM, Paul Gale <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> If possible can AMQ-5903 be included in 5.11.2? It's only on master at the
> moment, e.g. destined for 5.12.0.

Done… can you verify it’s on the branch properly and working?

Dan


>
> Thanks,
> Paul
>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Daniel Kulp <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> It’s been a while since 5.11.1 so I’d like to get a 5.11.2 release out
>> shortly, probably early/mid next week.    There’s not a lot of fixes on the
>> branch right now, just stuff mostly necessary for OSGi to support running
>> ActiveMQ in Karaf4.
>>
>> If there are other fixes that people would like to get in, please get them
>> cherry-picked to the activemq-5.11.x branch or send me the git hashes and I
>> can take a look and get them merged.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Kulp
>> [hidden email] - http://dankulp.com/blog
>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>
>>

--
Daniel Kulp
[hidden email] - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 5.11.2....

christopher.l.shannon
I checked Jira and there are over 100 bug issues against 5.12.0 that have
been resolved.  I'm thinking that going forward it might make sense to
backport fixes when the tickets are resolved if it makes sense to do so.
This won't work for all cases but it would cut down the work at release
time if some of the commits can be merged ahead of time.

On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Daniel Kulp <[hidden email]> wrote:

>
> > On Jul 30, 2015, at 10:44 AM, Paul Gale <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > If possible can AMQ-5903 be included in 5.11.2? It's only on master at
> the
> > moment, e.g. destined for 5.12.0.
>
> Done… can you verify it’s on the branch properly and working?
>
> Dan
>
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Paul
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Daniel Kulp <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> >> It’s been a while since 5.11.1 so I’d like to get a 5.11.2 release out
> >> shortly, probably early/mid next week.    There’s not a lot of fixes on
> the
> >> branch right now, just stuff mostly necessary for OSGi to support
> running
> >> ActiveMQ in Karaf4.
> >>
> >> If there are other fixes that people would like to get in, please get
> them
> >> cherry-picked to the activemq-5.11.x branch or send me the git hashes
> and I
> >> can take a look and get them merged.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> --
> >> Daniel Kulp
> >> [hidden email] - http://dankulp.com/blog
> >> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> >>
> >>
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> [hidden email] - http://dankulp.com/blog
> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 5.11.2....

dkulp

> On Jul 30, 2015, at 11:06 AM, Christopher Shannon <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> I checked Jira and there are over 100 bug issues against 5.12.0 that have
> been resolved.  I'm thinking that going forward it might make sense to
> backport fixes when the tickets are resolved if it makes sense to do so.

I’d love to see that, but most of the people that have implemented fixes don’t seem to want to spend the time pulling them back to any of the fixes branches.   :(    As long as the people doing the fixes aren’t willing to do it, it becomes really tough as it’s more about asking other folks to take a look.   That’s something even non-committers could do and help out with.   In this case, I specifically asked for any fixes or git hashes or something to pull back and got exactly one.  Not a good sign.  

> This won't work for all cases but it would cut down the work at release
> time if some of the commits can be merged ahead of time.

In any case, I do plan on doing the build on Wednesday or  Thursday.  If anyone would like something pulled back, please let me know.

Thanks!
Dan



>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Daniel Kulp <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>>
>>> On Jul 30, 2015, at 10:44 AM, Paul Gale <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>> If possible can AMQ-5903 be included in 5.11.2? It's only on master at
>> the
>>> moment, e.g. destined for 5.12.0.
>>
>> Done… can you verify it’s on the branch properly and working?
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Paul
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Daniel Kulp <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It’s been a while since 5.11.1 so I’d like to get a 5.11.2 release out
>>>> shortly, probably early/mid next week.    There’s not a lot of fixes on
>> the
>>>> branch right now, just stuff mostly necessary for OSGi to support
>> running
>>>> ActiveMQ in Karaf4.
>>>>
>>>> If there are other fixes that people would like to get in, please get
>> them
>>>> cherry-picked to the activemq-5.11.x branch or send me the git hashes
>> and I
>>>> can take a look and get them merged.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Daniel Kulp
>>>> [hidden email] - http://dankulp.com/blog
>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Kulp
>> [hidden email] - http://dankulp.com/blog
>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>
>>

--
Daniel Kulp
[hidden email] - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 5.11.2....

christopher.l.shannon
A couple of other bug candidates I thing would be good to include if not
already on the branch:

AMQ-5674: 20832f1f1b5bf028d43256a8b2172f2795b0c02d
AMQ-5742: c85fa67e1c65caecb96d3a044fbd5ac835cce3db
AMQ-5787 : e99c8148301c6ff6b6ed529a26ba3337ef20d016
AMQ-5813: ea03bb1f8cb2bce97fabdaa8fa287f4c9f977a3a
AMQ-5814 : e4af2eb63501251befc33a415abfad2b72d53321



On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Daniel Kulp <[hidden email]> wrote:

>
> > On Jul 30, 2015, at 11:06 AM, Christopher Shannon <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > I checked Jira and there are over 100 bug issues against 5.12.0 that have
> > been resolved.  I'm thinking that going forward it might make sense to
> > backport fixes when the tickets are resolved if it makes sense to do so.
>
> I’d love to see that, but most of the people that have implemented fixes
> don’t seem to want to spend the time pulling them back to any of the fixes
> branches.   :(    As long as the people doing the fixes aren’t willing to
> do it, it becomes really tough as it’s more about asking other folks to
> take a look.   That’s something even non-committers could do and help out
> with.   In this case, I specifically asked for any fixes or git hashes or
> something to pull back and got exactly one.  Not a good sign.
>
> > This won't work for all cases but it would cut down the work at release
> > time if some of the commits can be merged ahead of time.
>
> In any case, I do plan on doing the build on Wednesday or  Thursday.  If
> anyone would like something pulled back, please let me know.
>
> Thanks!
> Dan
>
>
>
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Daniel Kulp <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>> On Jul 30, 2015, at 10:44 AM, Paul Gale <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> If possible can AMQ-5903 be included in 5.11.2? It's only on master at
> >> the
> >>> moment, e.g. destined for 5.12.0.
> >>
> >> Done… can you verify it’s on the branch properly and working?
> >>
> >> Dan
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Paul
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Daniel Kulp <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> It’s been a while since 5.11.1 so I’d like to get a 5.11.2 release out
> >>>> shortly, probably early/mid next week.    There’s not a lot of fixes
> on
> >> the
> >>>> branch right now, just stuff mostly necessary for OSGi to support
> >> running
> >>>> ActiveMQ in Karaf4.
> >>>>
> >>>> If there are other fixes that people would like to get in, please get
> >> them
> >>>> cherry-picked to the activemq-5.11.x branch or send me the git hashes
> >> and I
> >>>> can take a look and get them merged.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks!
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Daniel Kulp
> >>>> [hidden email] - http://dankulp.com/blog
> >>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Daniel Kulp
> >> [hidden email] - http://dankulp.com/blog
> >> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> >>
> >>
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> [hidden email] - http://dankulp.com/blog
> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 5.11.2....

dkulp
Thanks for this list.  I’ve pulled these back (along with a couple others needed to get these to compile).   The tests all pass.

I’ll likely do the 5.11.2 builds tomorrow morning.  If anyone has anything else they need, let me know ASAP!

Thanks!
Dan



> On Aug 3, 2015, at 3:50 PM, Christopher Shannon <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> A couple of other bug candidates I thing would be good to include if not
> already on the branch:
>
> AMQ-5674: 20832f1f1b5bf028d43256a8b2172f2795b0c02d
> AMQ-5742: c85fa67e1c65caecb96d3a044fbd5ac835cce3db
> AMQ-5787 : e99c8148301c6ff6b6ed529a26ba3337ef20d016
> AMQ-5813: ea03bb1f8cb2bce97fabdaa8fa287f4c9f977a3a
> AMQ-5814 : e4af2eb63501251befc33a415abfad2b72d53321
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Daniel Kulp <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>>
>>> On Jul 30, 2015, at 11:06 AM, Christopher Shannon <
>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>> I checked Jira and there are over 100 bug issues against 5.12.0 that have
>>> been resolved.  I'm thinking that going forward it might make sense to
>>> backport fixes when the tickets are resolved if it makes sense to do so.
>>
>> I’d love to see that, but most of the people that have implemented fixes
>> don’t seem to want to spend the time pulling them back to any of the fixes
>> branches.   :(    As long as the people doing the fixes aren’t willing to
>> do it, it becomes really tough as it’s more about asking other folks to
>> take a look.   That’s something even non-committers could do and help out
>> with.   In this case, I specifically asked for any fixes or git hashes or
>> something to pull back and got exactly one.  Not a good sign.
>>
>>> This won't work for all cases but it would cut down the work at release
>>> time if some of the commits can be merged ahead of time.
>>
>> In any case, I do plan on doing the build on Wednesday or  Thursday.  If
>> anyone would like something pulled back, please let me know.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Dan
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Daniel Kulp <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 30, 2015, at 10:44 AM, Paul Gale <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> If possible can AMQ-5903 be included in 5.11.2? It's only on master at
>>>> the
>>>>> moment, e.g. destined for 5.12.0.
>>>>
>>>> Done… can you verify it’s on the branch properly and working?
>>>>
>>>> Dan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Paul
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Daniel Kulp <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> It’s been a while since 5.11.1 so I’d like to get a 5.11.2 release out
>>>>>> shortly, probably early/mid next week.    There’s not a lot of fixes
>> on
>>>> the
>>>>>> branch right now, just stuff mostly necessary for OSGi to support
>>>> running
>>>>>> ActiveMQ in Karaf4.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If there are other fixes that people would like to get in, please get
>>>> them
>>>>>> cherry-picked to the activemq-5.11.x branch or send me the git hashes
>>>> and I
>>>>>> can take a look and get them merged.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Daniel Kulp
>>>>>> [hidden email] - http://dankulp.com/blog
>>>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Daniel Kulp
>>>> [hidden email] - http://dankulp.com/blog
>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Kulp
>> [hidden email] - http://dankulp.com/blog
>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>
>>

--
Daniel Kulp
[hidden email] - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 5.11.2....

dejanb
Can you add https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5754 to the list?

Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
about.me/dejanb

On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Daniel Kulp <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Thanks for this list.  I’ve pulled these back (along with a couple others
> needed to get these to compile).   The tests all pass.
>
> I’ll likely do the 5.11.2 builds tomorrow morning.  If anyone has anything
> else they need, let me know ASAP!
>
> Thanks!
> Dan
>
>
>
> > On Aug 3, 2015, at 3:50 PM, Christopher Shannon <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > A couple of other bug candidates I thing would be good to include if not
> > already on the branch:
> >
> > AMQ-5674: 20832f1f1b5bf028d43256a8b2172f2795b0c02d
> > AMQ-5742: c85fa67e1c65caecb96d3a044fbd5ac835cce3db
> > AMQ-5787 : e99c8148301c6ff6b6ed529a26ba3337ef20d016
> > AMQ-5813: ea03bb1f8cb2bce97fabdaa8fa287f4c9f977a3a
> > AMQ-5814 : e4af2eb63501251befc33a415abfad2b72d53321
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Daniel Kulp <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>> On Jul 30, 2015, at 11:06 AM, Christopher Shannon <
> >> [hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I checked Jira and there are over 100 bug issues against 5.12.0 that
> have
> >>> been resolved.  I'm thinking that going forward it might make sense to
> >>> backport fixes when the tickets are resolved if it makes sense to do
> so.
> >>
> >> I’d love to see that, but most of the people that have implemented fixes
> >> don’t seem to want to spend the time pulling them back to any of the
> fixes
> >> branches.   :(    As long as the people doing the fixes aren’t willing
> to
> >> do it, it becomes really tough as it’s more about asking other folks to
> >> take a look.   That’s something even non-committers could do and help
> out
> >> with.   In this case, I specifically asked for any fixes or git hashes
> or
> >> something to pull back and got exactly one.  Not a good sign.
> >>
> >>> This won't work for all cases but it would cut down the work at release
> >>> time if some of the commits can be merged ahead of time.
> >>
> >> In any case, I do plan on doing the build on Wednesday or  Thursday.  If
> >> anyone would like something pulled back, please let me know.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >> Dan
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Daniel Kulp <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Jul 30, 2015, at 10:44 AM, Paul Gale <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If possible can AMQ-5903 be included in 5.11.2? It's only on master
> at
> >>>> the
> >>>>> moment, e.g. destined for 5.12.0.
> >>>>
> >>>> Done… can you verify it’s on the branch properly and working?
> >>>>
> >>>> Dan
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Paul
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Daniel Kulp <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> It’s been a while since 5.11.1 so I’d like to get a 5.11.2 release
> out
> >>>>>> shortly, probably early/mid next week.    There’s not a lot of fixes
> >> on
> >>>> the
> >>>>>> branch right now, just stuff mostly necessary for OSGi to support
> >>>> running
> >>>>>> ActiveMQ in Karaf4.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> If there are other fixes that people would like to get in, please
> get
> >>>> them
> >>>>>> cherry-picked to the activemq-5.11.x branch or send me the git
> hashes
> >>>> and I
> >>>>>> can take a look and get them merged.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Daniel Kulp
> >>>>>> [hidden email] - http://dankulp.com/blog
> >>>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Daniel Kulp
> >>>> [hidden email] - http://dankulp.com/blog
> >>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Daniel Kulp
> >> [hidden email] - http://dankulp.com/blog
> >> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> >>
> >>
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> [hidden email] - http://dankulp.com/blog
> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 5.11.2....

dkulp

> On Aug 5, 2015, at 9:47 AM, Dejan Bosanac <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Can you add https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5754 to the list?


Yep.  Done.  Thanks!

Dan


>
> Regards
> --
> Dejan Bosanac
> about.me/dejanb
>
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Daniel Kulp <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for this list.  I’ve pulled these back (along with a couple others
>> needed to get these to compile).   The tests all pass.
>>
>> I’ll likely do the 5.11.2 builds tomorrow morning.  If anyone has anything
>> else they need, let me know ASAP!
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Dan
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Aug 3, 2015, at 3:50 PM, Christopher Shannon <
>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>> A couple of other bug candidates I thing would be good to include if not
>>> already on the branch:
>>>
>>> AMQ-5674: 20832f1f1b5bf028d43256a8b2172f2795b0c02d
>>> AMQ-5742: c85fa67e1c65caecb96d3a044fbd5ac835cce3db
>>> AMQ-5787 : e99c8148301c6ff6b6ed529a26ba3337ef20d016
>>> AMQ-5813: ea03bb1f8cb2bce97fabdaa8fa287f4c9f977a3a
>>> AMQ-5814 : e4af2eb63501251befc33a415abfad2b72d53321
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Daniel Kulp <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 30, 2015, at 11:06 AM, Christopher Shannon <
>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I checked Jira and there are over 100 bug issues against 5.12.0 that
>> have
>>>>> been resolved.  I'm thinking that going forward it might make sense to
>>>>> backport fixes when the tickets are resolved if it makes sense to do
>> so.
>>>>
>>>> I’d love to see that, but most of the people that have implemented fixes
>>>> don’t seem to want to spend the time pulling them back to any of the
>> fixes
>>>> branches.   :(    As long as the people doing the fixes aren’t willing
>> to
>>>> do it, it becomes really tough as it’s more about asking other folks to
>>>> take a look.   That’s something even non-committers could do and help
>> out
>>>> with.   In this case, I specifically asked for any fixes or git hashes
>> or
>>>> something to pull back and got exactly one.  Not a good sign.
>>>>
>>>>> This won't work for all cases but it would cut down the work at release
>>>>> time if some of the commits can be merged ahead of time.
>>>>
>>>> In any case, I do plan on doing the build on Wednesday or  Thursday.  If
>>>> anyone would like something pulled back, please let me know.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> Dan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Daniel Kulp <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jul 30, 2015, at 10:44 AM, Paul Gale <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If possible can AMQ-5903 be included in 5.11.2? It's only on master
>> at
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> moment, e.g. destined for 5.12.0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Done… can you verify it’s on the branch properly and working?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dan
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Paul
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Daniel Kulp <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It’s been a while since 5.11.1 so I’d like to get a 5.11.2 release
>> out
>>>>>>>> shortly, probably early/mid next week.    There’s not a lot of fixes
>>>> on
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> branch right now, just stuff mostly necessary for OSGi to support
>>>>>> running
>>>>>>>> ActiveMQ in Karaf4.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If there are other fixes that people would like to get in, please
>> get
>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>> cherry-picked to the activemq-5.11.x branch or send me the git
>> hashes
>>>>>> and I
>>>>>>>> can take a look and get them merged.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Daniel Kulp
>>>>>>>> [hidden email] - http://dankulp.com/blog
>>>>>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Daniel Kulp
>>>>>> [hidden email] - http://dankulp.com/blog
>>>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Daniel Kulp
>>>> [hidden email] - http://dankulp.com/blog
>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Kulp
>> [hidden email] - http://dankulp.com/blog
>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>
>>

--
Daniel Kulp
[hidden email] - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 5.11.2....

dejanb
Cheers

Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
about.me/dejanb

On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Daniel Kulp <[hidden email]> wrote:

>
> > On Aug 5, 2015, at 9:47 AM, Dejan Bosanac <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > Can you add https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5754 to the list?
>
>
> Yep.  Done.  Thanks!
>
> Dan
>
>
> >
> > Regards
> > --
> > Dejan Bosanac
> > about.me/dejanb
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Daniel Kulp <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks for this list.  I’ve pulled these back (along with a couple
> others
> >> needed to get these to compile).   The tests all pass.
> >>
> >> I’ll likely do the 5.11.2 builds tomorrow morning.  If anyone has
> anything
> >> else they need, let me know ASAP!
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >> Dan
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Aug 3, 2015, at 3:50 PM, Christopher Shannon <
> >> [hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> A couple of other bug candidates I thing would be good to include if
> not
> >>> already on the branch:
> >>>
> >>> AMQ-5674: 20832f1f1b5bf028d43256a8b2172f2795b0c02d
> >>> AMQ-5742: c85fa67e1c65caecb96d3a044fbd5ac835cce3db
> >>> AMQ-5787 : e99c8148301c6ff6b6ed529a26ba3337ef20d016
> >>> AMQ-5813: ea03bb1f8cb2bce97fabdaa8fa287f4c9f977a3a
> >>> AMQ-5814 : e4af2eb63501251befc33a415abfad2b72d53321
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Daniel Kulp <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Jul 30, 2015, at 11:06 AM, Christopher Shannon <
> >>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I checked Jira and there are over 100 bug issues against 5.12.0 that
> >> have
> >>>>> been resolved.  I'm thinking that going forward it might make sense
> to
> >>>>> backport fixes when the tickets are resolved if it makes sense to do
> >> so.
> >>>>
> >>>> I’d love to see that, but most of the people that have implemented
> fixes
> >>>> don’t seem to want to spend the time pulling them back to any of the
> >> fixes
> >>>> branches.   :(    As long as the people doing the fixes aren’t willing
> >> to
> >>>> do it, it becomes really tough as it’s more about asking other folks
> to
> >>>> take a look.   That’s something even non-committers could do and help
> >> out
> >>>> with.   In this case, I specifically asked for any fixes or git hashes
> >> or
> >>>> something to pull back and got exactly one.  Not a good sign.
> >>>>
> >>>>> This won't work for all cases but it would cut down the work at
> release
> >>>>> time if some of the commits can be merged ahead of time.
> >>>>
> >>>> In any case, I do plan on doing the build on Wednesday or  Thursday.
> If
> >>>> anyone would like something pulled back, please let me know.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks!
> >>>> Dan
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Daniel Kulp <[hidden email]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Jul 30, 2015, at 10:44 AM, Paul Gale <[hidden email]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> If possible can AMQ-5903 be included in 5.11.2? It's only on master
> >> at
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>>> moment, e.g. destined for 5.12.0.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Done… can you verify it’s on the branch properly and working?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Dan
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>> Paul
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Daniel Kulp <[hidden email]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> It’s been a while since 5.11.1 so I’d like to get a 5.11.2 release
> >> out
> >>>>>>>> shortly, probably early/mid next week.    There’s not a lot of
> fixes
> >>>> on
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>> branch right now, just stuff mostly necessary for OSGi to support
> >>>>>> running
> >>>>>>>> ActiveMQ in Karaf4.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> If there are other fixes that people would like to get in, please
> >> get
> >>>>>> them
> >>>>>>>> cherry-picked to the activemq-5.11.x branch or send me the git
> >> hashes
> >>>>>> and I
> >>>>>>>> can take a look and get them merged.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thanks!
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> Daniel Kulp
> >>>>>>>> [hidden email] - http://dankulp.com/blog
> >>>>>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Daniel Kulp
> >>>>>> [hidden email] - http://dankulp.com/blog
> >>>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Daniel Kulp
> >>>> [hidden email] - http://dankulp.com/blog
> >>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Daniel Kulp
> >> [hidden email] - http://dankulp.com/blog
> >> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> >>
> >>
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> [hidden email] - http://dankulp.com/blog
> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>
>